For the best browsing experience on this site, we recommend you upgrade your browser
AboutSubscribe Your Editors Contact Us RSS

A Deflationary Conclusion to China's Bubble

The perception of China’s economic problems have changed. But they’re still stuck with the same problems they had a few months ago. That is, the need to rebalance a historically imbalanced economy.

Let’s go back to the official PMI index. Here’s a chart showing the index’s performance over the past three months, along with the sub-components. As you can see, the PMI, which is a composite index, came in at 49.2 in August, 49.8 in September, and 50.2 in October. While that signifies mild improvement, many of the sub-indices remain below 50…in other words, still contracting.

Source: Alphaville

 

The HSBC PMI, which is more a reflection of the experience of China’s private sector rather than the larger State Owned Enterprises, paints a weaker picture (see red line in chart below). But the chart clearly shows recent improvement, and that’s what the market is getting excited about.

But we don’t expect this improvement to last. China’s economy is in its post credit bubble adjustment phase. It’s still early days in China’s economic rebalancing. So don’t take this ‘improvement’ to suggest that China’s problems are over. This theme has years to play out.

 

China watcher Michael Pettis believes China’s economy resembles that of Japan in the late 1980s.

‘Because of the serious imbalances China is much more like Japan in the late 1980s, with the major difference being that Japan never took debt, investment and consumption imbalances to anywhere near the levels that China has taken them’

For a more detailed comparison between China and late 1980s Japan, check out this BBC article.

The consequences of China’s long term adjustment will hit Australia hardest, probably more so than China itself. Today’s Financial Review reports that ‘new data showed China’s demand for thermal coal had fallen sharply due to Beijing’s rapid switch to low emissions hydro, wind, nuclear and solar energy.’

The paper also quotes BHP divisional head Alberto Calderon as saying ‘The physical iron ore demand of China will go down. That high end of the cost curve will disappear.’

Calderon doesn’t expect this to happen until next decade. We reckon he’s being a little optimistic. China’s inevitable economic adjustment will ensure it tapers off much quicker than most industry forecasters expect.

He also said BHP will focus on investing outside Australia. The reason? Australia’s high cost of doing business…an unpleasant side effect of China’s credit bubble now flowing through the Aussie economy.

‘As an example of high costs in Australia, he cited the case of a truck driver’s wages in the Pilbara, which he said were $125,000 a year compared with $75,000 in the US. “You have a 60 per cent cost disadvantage in the hiring of a truck driver”, he said.’

Like all credit bubbles, the China boom left a trail of destruction in the form of mal-investments. That extends to huge (and unsustainable) iron ore profit margins and $125,000 per year truck drivers. (No offence to truck drivers, there’s plenty of other examples…bankers, CEO’s, real estate agents, investment newsletter writers…)

The final stages of China’s credit boom (2009-2011) left Australia with an inflationary wealth mirage. Deflationary episodes usually follow inflationary booms. So the question is…are we headed for a deflationary conclusion to the bubble in 2013?

More on this soon. Have a good weekend.

Regards,

Greg Canavan
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

From the Archives…

Investment Horizons – Introducing the Hubble Market Theory
26-10-2012 – Nick Hubble

The Big Fall in the Stock Market is Still to Come
25-10-2012 – Murray Dawes

A Safer Than Super Investment?
24-10-2012 – Nick Hubble

The Lost Generation in the US Ecoomy
23-10-2012 – Bill Bonner

NAB and Australian Banking is Oversized and Under Pressure
22-10-2012 – Dan Denning

2 Comments

  1. Pat Warriner says:

    Hang on, I resent mining executives whinging about the cost of employees. The simple fact is, if you want someone to work in isolated places, and you conduct bidding wars to get them, then high wages are what is going to result. And before they say its too much, I suggest they look at their own perks and lurks before crying about wages overheads.

    The real problem lies in the shifting of government pension liabilities to corporate Australia, and the state and federal governments constantly putting their hands in the cookie jar with outrageous charges for services. Add those charges up people. Hardly insignificant.

  2. Jason says:

    If people think this is bad, wait until China’s demographic shift kicks off. The big aging crisis followed by actual population decline within the next ten years (if not earlier). Then the mining magnates and pekingnese lapdog politicians will have something to really cry about.

Leave a Comment