Australia’s Subprime Borrowers Get NINJAD


Another day, another banking scandal. This is one is closer to home. The ABC puts it in blunt terms:

In 2007 Kate Thompson was WA mortgage broker of the year. Now she is facing fraud charges.

It is alleged Mortgage Miracles, in Canning Vale in Western Australia, obtained investment loans for customers by using falsely inflated earnings and assets.

Ms Thompson admits that is exactly what she did.

And that is about as tame as the story gets. From here on in, you don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

Our favourite part of the ABC story, apart from the name ‘Mortgage Miracles’, was this bit: ‘Kate Thompson recalls the tricks banks taught brokers to get loans across the line. Such as calling rising house prices ‘income’.’

What’s most remarkable is that this ‘income’ was part of ‘projected income.’ In other words, the expected rise in the price of the house the borrower was buying was called ‘income’ to justify the lending decision! Best of all, the more expensive the house, the bigger the income figure that could be thrown into the application.

As to the rest of the loan application, one borrower claims, ‘the loan amounts were wrong, my job was wrong, the amounts I earned was wrong, the small business I had, the valuation was wrong. There are 17 glaring mistakes that they had filled in that I didn’t know about.’

But how can people not know what’s on their mortgage application? The white knight in this story is Denise Brailey of the Banking and Finance Consumers Support Association Inc. She went to Canberra and told the Senators on the Economic References Committee about what has been going on.

CHAIR: What you are saying is that those applications were doctored after
[the applicants] had looked at them?

Ms Brailey: That is right.

You have to wonder what might be lurking on your mortgage application. You’ll find out in a moment why you might never know.

Don’t worry too much about all this. The banks, the Reserve Bank and the media have all been telling you that this isn’t a big problem in Australia:

‘Much of the subprime and other non-prime lending that went on [in the US] was not based on proper assessments of borrowers’ ability to service the loan. Brokers and lenders did not verify incomes or other financial obligations. We would never want to see this kind of asset-based lending in the Australian market…. I am pleased to say that I do not currently see signs of widespread lax lending practices here in Australia.’
Luci Ellis, Head of Financial Stability Department RBA, Address to the Australian Mortgage Conference 2012, 23 February 2012

Macquarie, in response to media coverage, claimed its ‘verification processes for all types of loans were, and continue to be, in line with industry standards, practices and regulations.’ That may be right. But the standards, practices and regulators are a joke.

Here is another highlight of Ms Brailey’s testimony to the Senators, which exposes the true state of affairs:

‘We have the loan application forms from over 400 people in the last six weeks. During that time, not one of them is a clean document – each one has been fraudulently dealt with…. I am a criminologist, Mr Chairman, so I understand a bit about that. The fraud is in misrepresenting the true income.’

So Australian banks might not have eased lending standards, leading to a sub-prime crisis. They just turned everyone into a prime borrower by falsifying figures on their application. Who needs lax lending standards when you can falsify income and assets? Now we don’t even know who is subprime and who isn’t.

Just like the Australian housing shortage turned out to be a surplus with the Census, you have to wonder how many prime borrowers might be subprime if proper stock was taken of their income and assets.

One fortunate lady was told by her bank that she owned $750,000 dollars of shares and earned tens of thousands in rental income. She offered the bank half of the assets if they could find them, because none of them existed.

In the US, they had NINJA loans – no income, no job, no assets. Here our NINJAs blend in with the prime borrowers. Including one NINJA borrower with a four million dollar loan!

Ok, so there were some bad apples.

‘Only a few fringe institutions were involved in the market. There are almost no non-conforming loans being issued at the moment, with the providers of such loans having exited or gone into extended hibernation.’
Guy Debelle, Assistant Governor (Financial Markets) RBA, 30 March 2010

Simply not so. Ms Brailey and Ms Thompson both have clear evidence that just about all banks are involved. The Australian reports how homeowners are fighting back against Australia’s major banks:

‘MANY of the nation’s biggest banks – including Westpac and Macquarie – are being forced to forgive debts granted on the basis of false information about borrowers supplied by mortgage brokers during the last property boom.

‘Under the scams, which draw parallels with US sub-prime lending practices, a number of mortgage brokers have been found to have substantially inflated incomes of low-income earners to allow them to borrow far more than they were able to repay.’

This is worse than America’s lax lending standards. It is systemic fraud conducted in a way that hides the tell-tale warning signs that would otherwise show up in the data. Australian banks learned from their American counterpartsthat subprime borrowers need to be hidden. We knew American subprime borrowers were subprime.

That made the US mess a predictable crisis. In Australia, we don’t know the extent of the problem, because the subprime borrowers appear to be prime. And they are hidden well.

Most of the problem loans are so called ‘no-doc loans’. These were supposed to be for business owners who had ABNs, but didn’t have the usual supporting documents to show they had a job and steady income.

Macquarie points out that no-doc loans aren’t subprime loans. Unfortunately, they often are, as Ms Brailey pointed out:

Senator WILLIAMS: Were low doc loans for self-employed people only?

Ms Brailey: Yes, that was the original idea: low doc for self-employed, ABNs for two years minimum plus GST registered. In these emails, I have highlighted where they show, time and time again-and some in big letters: ‘We do ABNs for a day. No LMI.’

Senator WILLIAMS: Who is saying, ‘We do ABNs for a day?’

Ms Brailey: The banks. There are 36 lenders involved that I have emails from showing them all doing the same thing.

Senator WILLIAMS: Are you saying that to be self-employed and to prove that you have an ABN the banks will issue you with one?

Ms Brailey: The brokers get them online. The BDMs teach the brokers to go online and get an ABN and then, ‘You can do that if you have the ladies or gents TFN.’

Senator WILLIAMS: I have a document here from one of the big four banks. [It explains] While self-employed status is declared by the customer in their loan application this information is not validated during the loan approval process.

In other words, subprime borrowers need only an ABN, supplied by the banks, and a banker willing to commit fraud to become no-doc borrowers. Throw in a couple of nonexistent assets, the ‘income’ of rising house prices and God knows what else and you have a prime borrower.

Australia’s NINJA borrowers were NINJAD. People with no income, no job, no assets, and no documents were given all four by their friendly banker. At least on paper.

The cover-up is already underway. The Americans had their Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS). It managed to lose and misplace documents to the point where nobody knows who owns what house. Once again, we’ve got something flat out worse than the Americans, as the Australian’s Anthony Klan has today reported:

‘One of the nation’s biggest low-doc issuers, the Bendigo and Adelaide Bank, has told borrowers they are not entitled to copies of their signed loan application forms, while other major lenders have told borrowers such documents have been “destroyed”, are “not relevant” or are “internal”.’

The American banks might have lost documents. The Australian banks just won’t give them to the borrowers. Or they destroy the documents like some sort of low grade fraudster.

The results of all this doomed lending have begun unfolding behind the scenes already. Ms Brailey reckons the banks are covering up the rising default rates in all sorts of creative ways:

‘The reality is that some of these people were given buffer loans to refinance, refinance and refinance, so they are never in default. I have a list 100 people who are still in their houses and have not paid a payment for four years simply because I have been there. There is a stalemate going on. They are not taking the houses but on the other hand the defaults are there, and I do not know what figures the bankers have decided to put those into.’

Meanwhile, Ms Brailey points out how the government is making a mint off all this:

‘The main thing I am going to raise, the first issue, is that the government has bought $14 billion worth of RMBSs since the GFC and I understand has committed another $4 billion to further purchases. The Fitch ratings say that eight to 10 per cent of all these RMBSs are low doc and approximately are loans obtained by fraud, and the government is holding tainted securities and profiting from that fraud. We believe there is about $57 billion involved. And, judging by the average loans, which go above FOS’s jurisdiction-we are talking about maybe 100,000 families affected-a government cannot, or at least cannot be seen to be profiting from that fraud of its constituents and must rectify that situation.’

As you can tell, Ms Brailey is a true realist. Her last sentence is priceless. ‘A government cannot, or at least cannot be seen to be profiting from fraud…’

That particular topic wasn’t addressed by the Senators at the hearing, despite it being the ‘main’ issue raised. Instead, a Senator pointed out that all this isn’t a big problem:

Chair: The evidence here suggests that there is no systemic issue. Obviously there will be individual cases that you can find where there have been some problems but there is no systemic problem. How do you respond to that?’

Ms Brailey: That is why we need a royal commission into the banking sector – they are strong words but that is what we need, because those figures are clearly wrong. The way the figures are translating at the moment makes you think that but that is not the reality.

Subprime was described as a ‘tiny tiny’ problem in the US in 2007 and 2008. It might have been true, but with all sorts of other underlying problems, a tiny tiny problem can be all it takes to unleash a financial crisis.

By the way, Australia’s financial sector is now larger than all of the Eurozone’s by market cap. That’s despite our GDP being about a twelfth the size.

EX vs. Aussie Financials Mkt Cap

When something is this far out of whack, it tends to revert. And that means a plunge in ASX financial shares. Look out.

Until next week,

Nickolai Hubble.
The Daily Reckoning Weekend Edition

ALSO THIS WEEK in The Daily Reckoning Australia

Will the Latest Data From China Cause a Rally in Aussie Stocks?
By Dan Denning

Now there’s good reason to doubt whether that stimulus will do anything useful. But remember, last time China went all in on intervention in 2009, it marked the beginning of a rally in Aussie stocks and commodity prices. There’s a lot at stake here, in other words.

The Secret Investment to Buy When GDP Falls
By Nick Hubble

The world is slowing down. China’s GDP growth is not what it used to be. And if you’re sceptical about Chinese statistics, you probably know it never was what it used to be.The Americans still haven’t found their feet, despite epic stimulus efforts. Europe is a basket case and probably in recession. In short, it’s time to invest in shares.

Australian Banks on the Run
By Dan Denning

Many of the commercial wealth management firms in Australia really ARE extensions of the Aussie banks, just under a different label. But the facts are the facts. And at the current pace, it won’t be long before the assets under management in the superannuation system exceed the assets on the Australian banks’ balance sheets. This raises an even more interesting dilemma.

Taking Over From the US Dollar With Organic Finance
By Greg Canavan

Jim Rickards, who presented at our Strategy Session on Tuesday, reckons the most likely outcome of all this is chaos. He wasn’t trying to be alarmist. He’s just saying that when a system of international finance comes to an end, it normally goes through a chaotic period before another system emerges. What will that system be?

Keynesianism vs. The Gold Coin Standard
By Gary North

Recently, the leftist London Guardian posted an article against the nineteenth-century gold coin standard. The author, who seems recently to have begun shaving, has provided a highly useful summary of the Keynesian case against the gold coin standard. His article is a fine mixture of familiar old canards and creative new errors.

Nick Hubble
Nick Hubble is a feature editor of The Daily Reckoning and editor of The Money for Life Letter. Having gained degrees in Finance, Economics and Law from the prestigious Bond University, Nick completed an internship at probably the most famous investment bank in the world, where he discovered what the financial world was really like. He then brought his youthful enthusiasm and energy to Port Phillip Publishing, where, instead of telling everyone about The Daily Reckoning, he started writing for it. To follow Nick's financial world view more closely you can you can subscribe to The Daily Reckoning for free here. If you’re already a Daily Reckoning subscriber, then we recommend you also join him on Google+. It's where he shares investment research, commentary and ideas that he can't always fit into his regular Daily Reckoning emails.

Leave a Reply

8 Comments on "Australia’s Subprime Borrowers Get NINJAD"

Notify of

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
4 years 2 months ago

Wow! And yet all you see in the msm is master chef and Julia Gillard’s former boyfriend. Look out below indeed!

4 years 2 months ago

Yup, that is what is going on. Otherwise how can the average Aussie income be under A$50k per year and the average Aussie house price over a half a million dollars?

And how about so called ‘industrial space’ and ‘factory units’? There are places in Western Sydney where vacant ones extend as far as the eye can see – and most of them have NEVER been occupied. They all have ‘market values’ in the millions – let’s just see someone actually buy one for that!

Denise Brailey
4 years 2 months ago
Brilliant piece Nicholai and thank you for the effort you put into the quotes. Your story on the banks show a full grasp of the main issues confronting us all. At the moment its like the elephant in the loungeroom. The service calculator will be the banks’ Achilles heel. The Banks do not wish to hand over that document. It was their own in house calculator that created the exaggerated incomes in every case. We have collected 4000 emails and more are on the way. Banks were bombarding the broker channel with teaching aids and promotional suggestions to increase business.… Read more »
4 years 2 months ago
Great article Nick. A nice window into how Oz banks are just like all the other players in the global game of Ponzi Finance. The entire traditional banking sector has lost its reserves to superannuation funds, enabling the shadow banking system has sprung up over those shifted reserves clear of such pesky things as regulation. Erosion of profits from traditional banking has forced traditional banks to enter the shadow world with all the fraud it entails. As I’ve been saying for many years now. Compulsory superannuation is one of the biggest scams of our time and a primary enabler of… Read more »
4 years 2 months ago

…enabling the shadow banking system *to *sprIng up..

4 years 1 month ago
A great and VERY TRUTHFUL article. The banks are corrupt to the core, and this corruption stems from the very top, those being : The Chairman, the CEO’s, and other Executives. These are the charlatans that must be prosecuted and jailed for allowing the fraud to continue. The Banks cannot be allowed to continue their PONZI schemes, their executives are no better than the convicted fraudster Bernie Madoff, and should be tried in a court of law accordingly. We must have a ROYAL COMMISSION immediately into the fraudulent activities of the banks. Our Loan Documents were also fraudulently altered. We… Read more »
4 years 1 month ago

the system was designed to enslaved us to work for the top 1%. The more people is enlighten and starting to question, waking up from this invisible prison, the only chance we have to over throw the banks.

3 years 1 month ago
Dear Nick, I found your story informative and also chilling as the reality is that like in America, Australian’s have been with this unanswered Low-Doc Loan Scandal for quit some time. One does not need to look too far to see the recent case of an elderly Greek Couple that where taken advantage of by the Bendigo Bank, with a scathing rebuke by the Court on the banks actions. What I have also found is how far that banks like the Bendigo will go to cover-up the actions of it’s Bank Managers and Staff using a cesspool of Lawyers and… Read more »
Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to