Investor Fear Creates a Mad Dash for the Bond Market

You don't often see yields on three-month U.S. Treasury notes fall by 66 basis points in one day. Then again, in polite (or even impolite society) the yield on three-month Treasury notes is not a subject you'd willingly bring up-unless you wanted to make a spectacle of yourself. But financial panics can bring even obscure subjects to the lips of an everyday punter.

The flight to cash has been more like a mad rush for the last two weeks. "The market is totally, absolutely, completely in fear mode," according to John Jansen. Jansen's been busy lately selling Treasuries for CastleOak Securities LP in New York. Earlier this week he told Bloomberg that, "People are afraid that lots and lots of mortgage paper and mortgage paper derivatives of all sorts is completely opaque and they can't price it."

Three-month U.S. Treasury notes are sort of like cash. If you were moving your money out of a short-term money-market account, and were looking for what's traditionally been a safe place, this is where you'd park your dough. Bond yields and prices move in opposite directions with Treasuries. Falling yields meaning rising prices. Rising prices mean rising demand. It follows that dramatically falling yields on the bond market mean dramatically rising prices. There's a mad dash to get to cash.

For the record, the fall in three-year Treasury yields earlier this week was the biggest one day fall since 1987. You might remember that year. On October 19th of that year the Dow fell by 22%. The ASX opened the next day at 2,052. It closed at 1,549. That 500 point drop equated to a 32% fall-in one day. It got worse from there, with the market closing as low as 1,151 on November 11th. That was your dip-buying opportunity.

The point of this quick trip down memory lane is that the bond market hasn't been this panicky since the stock market last crashed. Only we haven't had a crash this time around. Just a correction. Treasury yields rose today as prices fell. That means there was a bit less panic in the dash for cash. But there's no doubt investors are still nervous. They're nervous because no one knows if it's safe to go back in the water again and buy the kinds of asset-backed securities everyone's been buying for the last five years.

The Fed next meets on September 18th. The cadre of brokers, lenders, and financiers who engineered the whole mortgage bubble in America (and securitised and sold it to European banks and Australian hedge funds and local councils) desperately hope Ben Bernanke will take them off the hook and make it all go away by cutting rates.

September 6th might be a much more important date, though. That's the date the European Central Bank meets. The ECB has indicated it intends to raise rates in Europe to 4.25%. Whether it will do so in light of the recent disaster in financial markets is another question. If it does, all hell is going to break loose for the U.S. dollar. That's where we'd expect to see a big move in gold and oil.

Be careful about using low P/E ratios as a buying indicator. We read in this morning's paper that the average P/E on the ASX 200 is the lowest its been in 12 months. That doesn't automatically mean stocks are "good value." In fact, in the past, low P/E ratios have been a sign of the market top. Why?

At the height of an economic cycle, corporate earnings are high. When earnings rise faster than share prices, the P/E ratio will look low, flashing a "buy" signal. But this may be just the time that earnings themselves have peaked. That's definitely not the time to buy a stock.

It's probably a better idea to treat the stock market as a market of stocks. You go to the grocery store because you need food. But you don't buy one of everything because food prices look like good value. You buy particular value where you find it. And, if you're like us, you buy blueberries because of their anti-oxidant qualities. Blueberries have been awfully expensive lately, though.

What businesses or sectors have the ability to grow earnings in the next year? We noted in our weekly update to readers of Outstanding Investments that coal and iron ore prices are again going up. The question with resource stocks now is if price increases in the underlying commodities will eclipse wage and energy cost gains. Again, you take it on a case by case basis.

Dan Denning
The Daily Reckoning Australia

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

P.S. to get The Daily Reckoning direct to your inbox sign up to our free e-mail newsletter or if you prefer to use RSS, subscribe to the Daily Reckoning RSS feed.

Related Articles:

  • None Found

About the Author

DanDan Denning is the author of 2005's best-selling The Bull Hunter (John Wiley & Sons). Dan draws on his network of global contacts from his base in Melbourne. He’s the managing editor of resource newsletter Diggers and Drillers and the editor of The Daily Reckoning Australia.

See All Posts by This Author

There Is 1 Response So Far. »

  1. Keep it up, I'm enjoying your articles.

    Hedge funds we know what basis you are writing that statement on (I'm extremely good mates with the BDM's there and I feel for them, even they are leveraged up into the funds, they had no idea themselves, it wasn't like they knew the were flogging pure junk like Milliken, this was top rating product, they just didn't know the PM's must have had their fingers crossed under the tables I guess)....the Local Councils one is different- You're not referring to any fund manager in particular are you, you know, a Collins st one? I know the guy who was in the Fin Review 2 weeks ago with the 2 page spread. He was in the Securities division of that company and yes I can't understand how the councils bought that US stuff. The problems of having a US parent I guess. Having said that the local asset management arm of them (ie the fund manager) only has Australian AAA type stuff in their portfolio i believe and all their assets price daily. there is another high income manager with $2.7b odd in their fund, they'll surely find it a challenge to manage that kind of money if the credit cruch does come. surely at that size they must own a large chunk of some of those notes they hold?? we can only wait and see I guess. anyway, keep posting

    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    UN:F [1.7.5_995]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Post a Response

Comment moderation policy: Port Phillip Publishing supports free speech and frank and open conversation. But we reserve the right to modify or delete your comments if we consider them to be offensive or in violation of any laws, including Australia's anti-discrimination laws

By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our comment policy.


© Copyright The Daily Reckoning Australia & Port Phillip Publishing Pty LTD 2010 All rights reserved.

Port Phillip Publishing Pty Ltd holds an Australian Financial Services License: 323 988. View our Financial Services Guide.

ACN: 117 765 009 ABN: 33 117 765 009

Port Phillip Publishing
Attn: Daily Reckoning Australia
PO Box 899
Braeside
VIC 3195

Tel: 1300 667 481
Fax: (03) 9558 2219