<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black November Begins With US Federal Reserve&#8217;s $41b Citigroup Bailout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/citigroup-bailout/2007/11/02/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/citigroup-bailout/2007/11/02/</link>
	<description>An independent perspective on the Australian and global investment markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:27:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bowyer</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/citigroup-bailout/2007/11/02/comment-page-1/#comment-53576</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bowyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/citigroup-bailout/2007/11/02/#comment-53576</guid>
		<description>&quot;Government Considers Citigroup Rescue&quot;

Even more unthinkable than bailing out the U.S. automakers.

Citi is a MULTINATIONAL company. There&#039;s even several branch offices right here in Brno, Czech Republic that employ Czechs, not Americans.

Why should U.S. taxpayers bail out Citi? To save Czech jobs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Government Considers Citigroup Rescue"</p>
<p>Even more unthinkable than bailing out the U.S. automakers.</p>
<p>Citi is a MULTINATIONAL company. There's even several branch offices right here in Brno, Czech Republic that employ Czechs, not Americans.</p>
<p>Why should U.S. taxpayers bail out Citi? To save Czech jobs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/citigroup-bailout/2007/11/02/comment-page-1/#comment-4350</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/citigroup-bailout/2007/11/02/#comment-4350</guid>
		<description>YIKES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YIKES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Stocks</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/citigroup-bailout/2007/11/02/comment-page-1/#comment-4349</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Stocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/citigroup-bailout/2007/11/02/#comment-4349</guid>
		<description>I saw this $41 bil mentioned since Thursday. It is not correct. The Fed had $42.5 bil expiring Nov 1 (thursday) in their Temporary Open Market Operation (TOMO). It is unusual for them to have that much expiring at once because it was almost the complete balance of $47 bil., but it just worked out that way.
 
They replaced that $42.5 bil with just $41bil. In three repos expiring the 2nd, 8th, and 15th. In essence they drained $1.5 bil. Good site for keeping up with TOMO&#039;s.
http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx
 
It appears the media picked it up as a big add when it wasn&#039;t. They just replaced what was expiring.
 
That said, I am not going to say that haven&#039;t been adding - just in this case someone got it wrong. Amazing how this story took on a life of its own. Google &quot;Federal Reserve $41 bil&quot;. It is all over the place. 
 
Fed TOMO site
http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE
 
FWIW, 
 
Joe Eifrid
(Joe Stocks)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this $41 bil mentioned since Thursday. It is not correct. The Fed had $42.5 bil expiring Nov 1 (thursday) in their Temporary Open Market Operation (TOMO). It is unusual for them to have that much expiring at once because it was almost the complete balance of $47 bil., but it just worked out that way.</p>
<p>They replaced that $42.5 bil with just $41bil. In three repos expiring the 2nd, 8th, and 15th. In essence they drained $1.5 bil. Good site for keeping up with TOMO's.<br />
<a href="http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.gmtfo.com/RepoReader/OMOps.aspx</a></p>
<p>It appears the media picked it up as a big add when it wasn't. They just replaced what was expiring.</p>
<p>That said, I am not going to say that haven't been adding - just in this case someone got it wrong. Amazing how this story took on a life of its own. Google "Federal Reserve $41 bil". It is all over the place. </p>
<p>Fed TOMO site<br />
<a href="http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE" rel="nofollow">http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE</a></p>
<p>FWIW, </p>
<p>Joe Eifrid<br />
(Joe Stocks)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.365 seconds -->
