<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commonwealth Bank (ASX: CBA) Nearly Doubles Bad Debts Over Last Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/commonwealth-bank-cba-2/2008/08/14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/commonwealth-bank-cba-2/2008/08/14/</link>
	<description>An independent perspective on the Australian and global investment markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:27:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Freak'd</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/commonwealth-bank-cba-2/2008/08/14/comment-page-1/#comment-35052</link>
		<dc:creator>Freak'd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/?p=3300#comment-35052</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re slipping Dan.  You wrote; &quot;Bad debts as a portion of total loans went from 0.14 last year to 0.26 this year.&quot;   This could be taken to mean 14% and 26% or 0.14% and 0.26%.  So what is it?  Your later comment seems to indicate that it might be the sub-one percent figures. Also, your claim, coupled with quoting only two recent figures, can be misinterpreted that youv&#039;e brewed a little bit of a storm in a tea-cup with some statisitical artistry. Perhaps 0.14 to 0.26 is normal periodical variance? Perhaps its  a &#039;breakout&#039; as you seem to imply.  Quoting the mean and variance, or values of that figure going back 5-10 periods or more would give readers more confidence in what you are implying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're slipping Dan.  You wrote; "Bad debts as a portion of total loans went from 0.14 last year to 0.26 this year."   This could be taken to mean 14% and 26% or 0.14% and 0.26%.  So what is it?  Your later comment seems to indicate that it might be the sub-one percent figures. Also, your claim, coupled with quoting only two recent figures, can be misinterpreted that youv'e brewed a little bit of a storm in a tea-cup with some statisitical artistry. Perhaps 0.14 to 0.26 is normal periodical variance? Perhaps its  a 'breakout' as you seem to imply.  Quoting the mean and variance, or values of that figure going back 5-10 periods or more would give readers more confidence in what you are implying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/commonwealth-bank-cba-2/2008/08/14/comment-page-1/#comment-35049</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/?p=3300#comment-35049</guid>
		<description>I hope you meant bad debts went from 0.14% to 0.26%.  Otherwise I&#039;m in trouble!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you meant bad debts went from 0.14% to 0.26%.  Otherwise I'm in trouble!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/commonwealth-bank-cba-2/2008/08/14/comment-page-1/#comment-35039</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/?p=3300#comment-35039</guid>
		<description>And they grew their mortgage book by 14%!  The CBA board is living in an alternate universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they grew their mortgage book by 14%!  The CBA board is living in an alternate universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.225 seconds -->
