‘Death of Gold’ Claims Proven Wrong as Gold Price Surges Again


If what you think depends on where you sit, then in early 2000, the Oxford historian Niall Ferguson – like pretty much everyone else who pulled up a chair and took a look – sat two decades into the final demise of gold as a valuable asset.

He wasn’t to know, of course, that gold’s 20-year bear market was about to hit rock-bottom…nor that his own TV and book-signing career was about to take off as well, bringing him tenure at both Harvard University and the Harvard Business School, plus a weekly column in the Los Angeles Times.

But in studying 300 years of “money and power in the modern world” as he subtitled his 2001 book, The Cash Nexus, Professor Ferguson might have at least wondered whether tomorrow would bring something different for gold from today.

The lesson of history, after all, is that nothing lasts forever…nothing, perhaps, except gold. Least reactive of all metals, and impossible to destroy with anything other than cyanide to dissolve it, gold had been used as a store of wealth across the world for more than 3,500 years.

By the end of the 20th century, however, the more recent past read like an obituary for the “barbarous relic” of ancient kings.

Hence the “Death of Gold” proclaimed by a Financial Times’ editorial in 1997, together with The Economist’s seemingly annual rant against gold throughout that decade. Come October 1999, and BusinessWeek told its readers that “this ancient form of wealth is less an international currency and stable store of value than ever before.

“It’s just another commodity that swings to the global rhythm of supply and demand.”
In short, “the twilight of gold appeared to have arrived,” agreed Professor Ferguson, stepping out of the lecture hall and into his gypsy fortune-teller’s painted caravan. “True, total blackout is still some way off,” he forecast in his 2001 book, and “gold has a future, of course, but mainly as jewellery.”

All the evidence he gathered together at the turn of this century pointed to “the creeping demonetisation” of gold. First, the international Gold Standard had collapsed at the start of World War One, after dominating global finance for barely 13 years. The Gold Exchange system of world currencies that followed it seemed only to spread and deepen the Great Depression. In turn it collapsed, too, on the eve of World War II.

The United States then ceased paying gold in exchange for US Dollars in 1971, finally destroying the post-war Bretton Woods settlement and severing all links between the world’s most important currency and the “barbarous relic” of gold.

Funnily enough, the end of gold’s convertibility into Dollars sparked a 24-fold spike in its Dollar-price by the start of 1980. But “the surge in gold prices that occurred during the 1970s was historically anomalous,” said Ferguson as the 20th century drew to a close, “reflecting a sudden increase in demand for gold…and the rapid depreciation of most Western currencies relative to oil and other commodities.”

The “historical anomaly” of US$850 gold lasted just one day, in fact – 21st Jan. 1980 – and from then on, gold’s role as a monetary asset sank almost as fast as its price. By the end of 1999, the gold price was languishing at a 20-year low. Then the British government, founder and guardian of the international gold standard a century before, picked its moment to sell half of its national gold reserves, swapping the metal for Dollars, Euros and Yen to keep in the Bank of England’s vaults.

At the very same time, the Swiss National Bank – last of the world’s central banks to abandon the Gold Standard in the 1930s – sold half of its gold reserves, too. The sale required a change to the Swiss constitution, and that required a national referendum of the Swiss people, plus a re-writing of Switzerland’s currency statutes! But the central banks of Argentina, Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Luxembourg, the Czech Republic and India were already selling gold by this point.

So what had the Swiss people to fear? What comfort were they hoping to take from gold bullion anyway? The changes were ratified, the legal link between gold and the Swiss Franc was severed at last, and the SNB began the sale of 1,300 tonnes of gold in a five-year program.

“From the point of view of investors in the West, where the possibility (or at least the memory) of financial catastrophe has receded, the twilight of gold makes some sense,” Ferguson went on. “As an investment, gold has signally under-performed stocks and government bonds in the United States and Britain in the past century.”

Surveying the world from the dreaming spires of Oxford, however, “gold also has a future as a store of value in parts of the world with primitive or unstable monetary and financial systems,” forecast the don.

“Gold will [also] continue to have an appeal as a store of value anywhere where currencies or banking systems are fragile,” he added, pointing to “the countries of the former Soviet Union.”

But given what’s happened to world gold prices since then, however, might Professor Ferguson now want to review his opinion of Western currencies and banking systems? Seeing the recent run on Northern Rock in Great Britain – and the near-run on Countrywide Bank in California, an event which Ferguson himself reported in a recent column for the L.A. Times – might Western governments also want to reconsider their disdain for gold, that barbarous relic of less enlightened times?

Fast forward to late 2007, and gold is now approaching its seventh annual gain on the trot. Rising by nearly a quarter against the Dollar over the last 12 months – and rising by 10% and more against both the Euro and British Pound – the “anomaly” of surging gold prices in the 1970s has made a comeback.
Put another way, the “Long Boom” enjoyed from 1982 to 2000 may have discounted tech-stock earnings until A.D. 2146 on the Nasdaq index, but it failed to abolish the threat of instability in Europe and the United States. At least, that’s what the gold market has been saying since the current surge got underway in mid-2005. And just as the famous “End of History” proclaimed by Francis Fukuyama in 1989 proved to be merely a weekend vacation during the mid-to-late 1990s, so the “Death of Gold” announced by historians, pundits and analysts at the very same time has proved somewhat premature.

Of course, investors joining this bull market now should beware of repeating their error. But if deciding to buy gold feels at all hard today, it might suggest the top of this market remains a long way off yet.

And for as long as Bloomberg columnists argue that buying gold is like “believing in the tooth fairy,” you might also take comfort in the fact that mainstream consensus is still opposed to gold.

Just like it was at the turn of this century.

Adrian Ash
The Daily Reckoning Australia

Adrian Ash
City correspondent for The Daily Reckoning in London and formerly head of editorial at Fleet Street Publications Ltd, Adrian Ash has been studying and writing about the investment markets for the last 9 years. He is now head of research at BullionVault - giving you direct access to investment gold, vaulted in Zurich, on US$3 spreads and 0.8% dealing fees.
Adrian Ash

Latest posts by Adrian Ash (see all)


Leave a Reply

2 Comments on "‘Death of Gold’ Claims Proven Wrong as Gold Price Surges Again"

Notify of

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Chris. Fulker
9 years 15 days ago
What to make of this latest six-week-long advance? Undoubtedly, it is being driven by fund buying, and we ARE being set up for a correction. But there must aso be a significant degree of individual investor interest: this is most decidedly NOT 1980, when a one-day spike was followed by…what? Not much. We are now seeing a gradual increase built into the price long-term. I doubt we can keep all of late-August/September/October’s gains but $700 looks secure. On a broader look, what does it matter? – the economic fundamentals remain as ever (grim). Our favourite metal is unlikely to fall… Read more »
The Hobbit
The Hobbit
9 years 15 days ago

I concur with Chris that there could be a pullback in gold price if the dollar stages a countertrend rally. Long term I think at least a small position in a gold etf might be a prudent thing. A pullback might be a buying chance.

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to letters@dailyreckoning.com.au