<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World&#8217;s Biggest Debtor Nation Posts $61.2B Trade Deficit for December 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/</link>
	<description>An independent perspective on the Australian and global investment markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:27:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Lazar</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/comment-page-1/#comment-115800</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Lazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/#comment-115800</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re not as bad off as some countries right now, but we&#039;re moving in that direction.  If the United States had any balls, we would induce our day of reckoning now instead of postponing it indefinitely.  A properly engineered overhaul now could actually make the US and even stronger economic force than we already are.  We could bring Europe, China, the Middle East, and the rest of the BRIC to its knees.  Perhaps that&#039;s what the Fed already has in mind, but they&#039;ve done nothing to move in that direction so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're not as bad off as some countries right now, but we're moving in that direction.  If the United States had any balls, we would induce our day of reckoning now instead of postponing it indefinitely.  A properly engineered overhaul now could actually make the US and even stronger economic force than we already are.  We could bring Europe, China, the Middle East, and the rest of the BRIC to its knees.  Perhaps that's what the Fed already has in mind, but they've done nothing to move in that direction so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom3k</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/comment-page-1/#comment-91523</link>
		<dc:creator>tom3k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/#comment-91523</guid>
		<description>brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertie</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/comment-page-1/#comment-73869</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/#comment-73869</guid>
		<description>Buy gold and all will be well!

Rex Connor to run Ruddbank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy gold and all will be well!</p>
<p>Rex Connor to run Ruddbank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Demello</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/comment-page-1/#comment-73467</link>
		<dc:creator>David Demello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/#comment-73467</guid>
		<description>&quot;Since 1985, the cumulative deficit has grown to about USD $4 trillion, or about USD $13,000 for each man, woman,and child in the U.S.(February 14th,2007)&quot;

U.S. NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK 
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 10 Apr 2009 at 05:46:36 AM GMT is:
---------------$11,150,425,053,759.15-----------------
The estimated population of the United States is 305,973,687

so each citizen&#039;s share of this debt is $36,442.43.
------------------------------------------------------
just wait until the unfunded entitlements kick in. you aint seen nothing yet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Since 1985, the cumulative deficit has grown to about USD $4 trillion, or about USD $13,000 for each man, woman,and child in the U.S.(February 14th,2007)"</p>
<p>U.S. NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK<br />
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 10 Apr 2009 at 05:46:36 AM GMT is:<br />
---------------$11,150,425,053,759.15-----------------<br />
The estimated population of the United States is 305,973,687</p>
<p>so each citizen's share of this debt is $36,442.43.<br />
------------------------------------------------------<br />
just wait until the unfunded entitlements kick in. you aint seen nothing yet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Non-Delusional-American</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/comment-page-1/#comment-59400</link>
		<dc:creator>Non-Delusional-American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/#comment-59400</guid>
		<description>Answering Cyberman:
1) First up is that wiki-pedia has lost a LOT of credibility because more &quot;americans&quot; re-write what they don&#039;t like on that site. The original concept has fallen to a true democracy, because 51% say it should be so, they are right and the other 49% are wrong.

2) Even with this mans expertise on the subject the &quot;True Debt&quot; of the United States is not known.  But it can be generalized.  One problem with the Wiki and the normal reports of major US backing sources is that the United States includes &quot;Services&quot; in the calculation for GNP (Gross National Product) as well as &quot;Energy Production&quot; - this leads to false indicators of economic strength.  Fully 2/3rds of the current GNP of the USA is energy and services.

Bottom Line - when you own the people making those &#039;reports&#039; and set the standards and guidelines for how they are done; then you can basically control what people think is really going on.
I am no expert in international finance, but I think Mr. Turk&#039;s estimate is very low, and the &#039;real debt&#039; is much higher.
If you were to factor out all non-exports, weigh that against the current gold reserve (currency backing) add those two together and then subtract Import Debt from that you would come up with a MUCH larger number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answering Cyberman:<br />
1) First up is that wiki-pedia has lost a LOT of credibility because more "americans" re-write what they don't like on that site. The original concept has fallen to a true democracy, because 51% say it should be so, they are right and the other 49% are wrong.</p>
<p>2) Even with this mans expertise on the subject the "True Debt" of the United States is not known.  But it can be generalized.  One problem with the Wiki and the normal reports of major US backing sources is that the United States includes "Services" in the calculation for GNP (Gross National Product) as well as "Energy Production" - this leads to false indicators of economic strength.  Fully 2/3rds of the current GNP of the USA is energy and services.</p>
<p>Bottom Line - when you own the people making those 'reports' and set the standards and guidelines for how they are done; then you can basically control what people think is really going on.<br />
I am no expert in international finance, but I think Mr. Turk's estimate is very low, and the 'real debt' is much higher.<br />
If you were to factor out all non-exports, weigh that against the current gold reserve (currency backing) add those two together and then subtract Import Debt from that you would come up with a MUCH larger number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyberman</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/comment-page-1/#comment-42685</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/#comment-42685</guid>
		<description>I must admit I&#039;m not sure about how serious is the US debt.

According to Wiki the public debt in America is less than in Germany?? Can someone explain?

{http}://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_debt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit I'm not sure about how serious is the US debt.</p>
<p>According to Wiki the public debt in America is less than in Germany?? Can someone explain?</p>
<p>{http}://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_public_debt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alakh Niranjan Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/comment-page-1/#comment-18640</link>
		<dc:creator>Alakh Niranjan Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/#comment-18640</guid>
		<description>A great article, but I have major differences with its ending.  We can&#039;t return to gold in the future even though I agree to your following statements: 
&quot;The world&#039;s major economies are all living far beyond their means and are borrowing to cover the difference. And they will, it now seems certain, continue to create as much new currency as it takes to delay the day of reckoning. The stage is set, in short, for a currency collapse a la Weimar Germany or 1990s Argentina, in which the world simply loses confidence in the dollar in particular, In such a &quot;flight from currency,&quot; the demand for dollars will dry up.&quot; 

I disagree to the words beyond that which are;

&quot;and currencies in general.&quot;  I want to tell clearly that losing confidence in dollar does not mean losing confidence in any currency.  The credibility of a currency is retained by its ability to retain value.  Gold is valuable because gold retains its value in terms of other goods.  Dollar is losing its credibility because USA is printing it a lot to finance its trade deficits and for such unprodictive activities like Iraq war.  Dollar had lost value during Vietnam War also.  If USA stops indulging in such expesnive wars, its currency would start appreciating.  Wars are also contributing to trade deficit though of course outsourcing is the bigger reason for trade deficits.  Additionally USA needs to manage its dependence on external oil and start withdrawing from its own oil reserves of Alaska.  That would kill the bargaining power of gulf countries and arrest rising oil prices.  All these would again bring confidence in dollar.  Finally if dollar loses credibility because of bad economic management by the US Government, its competitor Euro is gaining ground followed by other currencies like RMB, Yen, Indian Rupee.  Hence my conclusion is, &quot;People will not return to gold because gold does not have the flexibility and efficiency of paper currency, but people will return to the currency which is best managed by its government.  It can be dollar, it can be euro, it can be RMB, it can be Indian rupee or any other best managed currency, but it will certainly not be gold.  paper currecny is like candidates in a democracy where people have no choice but to choose the one who is the smartest among the group, though the group itself may sometimes contain all mediocres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great article, but I have major differences with its ending.  We can't return to gold in the future even though I agree to your following statements:<br />
"The world's major economies are all living far beyond their means and are borrowing to cover the difference. And they will, it now seems certain, continue to create as much new currency as it takes to delay the day of reckoning. The stage is set, in short, for a currency collapse a la Weimar Germany or 1990s Argentina, in which the world simply loses confidence in the dollar in particular, In such a "flight from currency," the demand for dollars will dry up." </p>
<p>I disagree to the words beyond that which are;</p>
<p>"and currencies in general."  I want to tell clearly that losing confidence in dollar does not mean losing confidence in any currency.  The credibility of a currency is retained by its ability to retain value.  Gold is valuable because gold retains its value in terms of other goods.  Dollar is losing its credibility because USA is printing it a lot to finance its trade deficits and for such unprodictive activities like Iraq war.  Dollar had lost value during Vietnam War also.  If USA stops indulging in such expesnive wars, its currency would start appreciating.  Wars are also contributing to trade deficit though of course outsourcing is the bigger reason for trade deficits.  Additionally USA needs to manage its dependence on external oil and start withdrawing from its own oil reserves of Alaska.  That would kill the bargaining power of gulf countries and arrest rising oil prices.  All these would again bring confidence in dollar.  Finally if dollar loses credibility because of bad economic management by the US Government, its competitor Euro is gaining ground followed by other currencies like RMB, Yen, Indian Rupee.  Hence my conclusion is, "People will not return to gold because gold does not have the flexibility and efficiency of paper currency, but people will return to the currency which is best managed by its government.  It can be dollar, it can be euro, it can be RMB, it can be Indian rupee or any other best managed currency, but it will certainly not be gold.  paper currecny is like candidates in a democracy where people have no choice but to choose the one who is the smartest among the group, though the group itself may sometimes contain all mediocres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Conklin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/comment-page-1/#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Conklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/#comment-1725</guid>
		<description>While Germany, the largest exporter in the world, racked up its largest trade surplus in history in 2006 Euros 161.9 billion (US$209.2 billion) The US racked up its largest trade deficit in hostory (US$763.6 billion)  The realprime reason is the US tax law that double taxes US citzens who live and work abroad so they will not go abroad and sell US. produts and services.  In spite of US Equal opportnity for employment laws, US companies cannot afford to hire US citizens for overseas assignments because this double taxation requires that Americans be reimbursed for this extra tax cost in over to survive. This amounts to an export tax on US labor.  No other country in the world taxes its overseas citizens.  This has brainwashed US companies to &quot;forget&quot; about exporting and concentrate on our domestic market.  Germany exports over 4 times per capita what the US exports, even though its costs, taxes and wages are higher and it is even more dependent on imported petroleum than the US.  The US tax on overseas citizens raises a pittqnce in tax revenue, but serves as a tremendous barrier against US exports.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Germany, the largest exporter in the world, racked up its largest trade surplus in history in 2006 Euros 161.9 billion (US$209.2 billion) The US racked up its largest trade deficit in hostory (US$763.6 billion)  The realprime reason is the US tax law that double taxes US citzens who live and work abroad so they will not go abroad and sell US. produts and services.  In spite of US Equal opportnity for employment laws, US companies cannot afford to hire US citizens for overseas assignments because this double taxation requires that Americans be reimbursed for this extra tax cost in over to survive. This amounts to an export tax on US labor.  No other country in the world taxes its overseas citizens.  This has brainwashed US companies to "forget" about exporting and concentrate on our domestic market.  Germany exports over 4 times per capita what the US exports, even though its costs, taxes and wages are higher and it is even more dependent on imported petroleum than the US.  The US tax on overseas citizens raises a pittqnce in tax revenue, but serves as a tremendous barrier against US exports.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aron</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/comment-page-1/#comment-1703</link>
		<dc:creator>Aron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 05:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/debtor-nation/2007/02/14/#comment-1703</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t have put it better myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn't have put it better myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.240 seconds -->
