U.S. Fed Bailout Corroding Capitalism and the U.S. Dollar


Welcome to Fed’s “Bail-Out Nation.”

America, the Land of the Free, is quickly becoming the “Land of the Freebie,” especially for members of the millionaire corporate elite who make multi-billion dollar mistakes… with someone else’s money. This unfortunate state of affairs is jeopardizing the dollar’s value, as well as its hard-won reserve-currency status.

Once upon a time, American-style capitalism resembled a bare-knuckled fistfight – a continuous “Ultimate Fighting” match in which competitors would pummel one another until a victor emerged. But modern American-style capitalism is more like “arts and crafts” time in one of Manhattan’s pricey nursery schools. Every coddled kiddy’s “artistic” creation – no matter how inept or ghastly it may be – elicits praise from the nursery school instructors. Indeed, every grunt elicits praise…and every boo-boo finds a Band-aid.

Outside the walls of the nursery school, capitalism is just as brutal and Darwinian as it has always been, perhaps even more so. But on the inside, the privileged kiddies never shed a tear without receiving an immediate hug and a “There, there. It’s okay. It wasn’t your fault… and even if it was your fault, Uncle Ben will make it all better.”

As for discipline; forget it. The coddled capitalists of America’s high finance never receive a slap on the wrist for any misdeed whatsoever. That would be child-abuse. Nor do they ever even receive a time-out for bad behavior. Worst case, punishment arrives in the form of multi-million dollar severance packages.

Who are these “nursery school” capitalists? They are the folks who receive millions of dollars each year to preside over public corporations and/or to speculate with the shareholders’ capital.

American corporations are crawling with these leeches. Using other people’s money, they engage in moronic speculations, knowing that success will multiply their net worth dramatically and that failure will produce negligible negative consequences. And sometimes even failure produces success, thanks to the Federal Reserve’s well-established penchant for bailing out speculators.

Because Wall Street’s privileged speculators receive continuous coddling, they never really learn to behave themselves. Thus, when the multi- millionaire, Nobel-prize winning operators of Long Term Capital Management fell down and got an “owy” in 1998, Alan Greenspan’s Federal Reserve rushed to their sides with Fed bailout Band-aids aplenty and emergency doses of financial Bactine. He slashed interest rates, while also cajoling Wall Street’s leading banks to provide a multi-billion dollar bailout.

Everyone called it a rescue plan for the capital markets. But the capital markets of 1998 required no rescuing. They had worked flawlessy; they had separated fools from their money.

But because the fools in question hailed from leading Wall Street institutions, and because the Wall Street institutions, themselves, stood to lose billions of dollars, LTCM would not be allowed to fail. Thus, the Fed bailout of 1998 was nothing more than government-sponsored collusion to rescue speculators from the consequences of their ill-conceived speculations.

But the Fed bailout succeeded in sparking a robust year-end rally, which made lots of people very happy…and Alan Greenspan very popular. Few folks cared that the bailout would lead directly to the largest stock market bubble of the preceding 60 years – a bubble that would produce an epic bust and erase hundreds of billions of dollars from the savings accounts of unsuspecting individual investors.

During the early years of the 21st century, the Fed continued coddling Wall Street’s privileged few, by slashing short-term interest rates to unnecessarily low levels. Who benefited? Lots of banks and lots of speculators…and lots of speculating bankers.

The speculators devised numerous ways to capitalize upon ultra-cheap short- term financing. The speculators become overnight investment geniuses by borrowing short-term and speculating long-term. But the sort of genius that relies on short-term financing often perishes at maturity. Only a complete moron would borrow short-term and invest long-term, without preparing an emergency back-up plan or exit strategy – only a complete moron…or a coddled capitalist.

Fast-forward to the summer of 2007 – the financial “Summer of Love” – and we find the same playpen of privileged kiddies making the same poopies in their diapers. All the biggest banks and brokers on Wall Street found themselves on the losing side of some kind of ill-conceived loan. They found themselves on the hook for billions of dollars worth of loans that no individual of moderate intelligence would have ever issued with his own money.

Not only did Wall Street’s genius bankers issue billions of dollars worth of idiotic loans, they also packaged the loans into billions of dollars worth of idiotic mortgage-backed securities (MBS). The bankers then sliced, diced and reformulated various types of mortgages into various categories (tranches) of collaterized debt obligations CDOs and other asset-backed exotica.

Why did the whiz kids go to such great lengths to repackage mortgage loans? Because it was a great way to move these things off their own companies’ balance sheets, and onto someone else’s. By moving the loans elsewhere, the bankers could originate new idiotic loans, create new idiotic mortgage-backed securities for public consumption…and collect hefty fees along every step of the process.

When the Wall Street bankers couldn’t find any real buyers for their idiotic mortgages and MBS, they would create non-real buyers called structured investment vehicles (SIVs). These SIVs would borrow money, just like a corporation, then use the money to buy mortgage-backed securities from the Wall Street bankers who created the SIVs. The process would be something like setting up a shell company to buy your house from you.

As long as the shell company could obtain financing, it could easily buy your house, and might not even quibble about the price (but that’s a topic for another day). Unfortunately, if the shell company suddenly lost access to financing, it would have no choice but to sell the house it bought from you at whatever price it could obtain.

That’s exactly where we are today.

Typically, SIVs borrowed short-term money in the commercial paper market, rolling over their obligations every few months. In essence, therefore, the SIVs financed their long-term mortgage assets with short-term CPO liabilities. The process worked brilliantly…until it didn’t.

In mid-August, the asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) market tumbled into a deep-freeze, thereby eliminating the SIVs’ primary source of funding. What happens to an SIV that cannot borrow in the CP market, you may be wondering? Option A) It liquidates its portfolio of mortgage securities at fire-sale prices; Option B) It goes knocking on the door of its original underwriter for emergency funding.

Unfortunately, “Option A” includes the distasteful side-effect of putting real-world prices on the billions of dollars worth of illiquid securities that still carry Wall Street’s fantasy prices. Replacing fantasy prices with real-world prices would force many American financial institutions to fess up to the billions of dollars of additional mark-to-market losses – losses that the institutions are pretending they have not already incurred. “Option B,” therefore, seems like the lesser of two evils, but only in small doses. Large doses of “Option B” could cause serious indigestion on bank balance sheets.

Enter the beefy “Master Liquidity Enhancement Conduit,” or M-LEC to save the day. This $80 billion fund-to-be, according to Bloomberg News, “will help SIVs, which own $320 billion of assets, avoid selling their holdings at fire- sale prices.”

Here’s how the whole thing is supposed to work: Citigroup, Bank of America, JP Morgan and a few lending institutions to be named later will kick $80 billion into a fund. The fund will buy AA- or AAA-rated SIVs. Once these SIVs become the M-LEC’s property, they cease to require financing from the commercial paper market or, more importantly, from the lending institutions who are providing the $80 billion bailout. In effect, the banks are bailing out themselves.

To the skeptical observer, therefore, the M-LEC merely puts a happy face on a grim inevitability. These banks would be on the hook for billions of dollars worth of financing anyway. So while pretending to “provide liquidity to the SIV market,” the M-LEC is merely a ruse…and not even a very good one.

For one thing, Goldman Sachs is conspicuously absent from the consortium of participating banks, even though former Goldman CEO, and current Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, brokered the deal. Presumably, Goldman demurred because it has no interest whatsoever in stepping into the SIV tar pit that has ensnared its competitors…and will continue to ensnare its competitors.

The second problem with the M-LEC ruse is that it will not commence operations for 90 days. That’s an eternity in the commercial paper world where the SIVs are fighting for their survival. The 90-day lead-time reveals the insincerity – or incompetence – of the M-LEC proposal. Many, many SIVs could implode over the next 90 days – many more, in fact, than an $80 billion fund could hope to rescue.

The entire SIV market totals more than $320 billion in assets, most of which relies on financing of less than 270 days. Do the math.

The third glaring problem with the M-LEC ruse is that it will buy only AAA- or AA-rated SIVs, where the least of the problems reside. A genuine bailout fund would buy the most toxic securities first, and leave the highly rated stuff out in the marketplace to find real-world buyers. This curious aspect of the M-LEC, therefore, elicits the thought, “Gosh, maybe the banks are trying to support the prices of the highly rated stuff they haven’t marked to market, rather than the lowly-rated stuff they don’t own.”

Net-net, the M-LEC is a joke – a very bad joke.

It is the kind of joke that attempts to rescue well-heeled speculators from the consequences of their recklessness…without providing any benefit whatsoever to the capital markets overall. The SIV world doesn’t need a bailout; it needs a mark-to-market. If SIVs were reflecting their real-world pricing, instead of Wall Street’s government-sponsored fantasy pricing, REAL capitalists would be lining up to purchase them or to provide financing.

The American capital markets do not need M-LECs, they do not need bailouts; they do not need rescuing…except from the “nursery school” capitalists who consider their wealth an entitlement, and who believe that their failures and their successes both deserve multi-million dollar paydays.

The “Bail-Out Nation” is costing us all dearly. Every Fed bailout undermines the dollar’s value and international prestige. That’s a very heavy price tag. If the “Bail-Out Nation” does not allow its coddled capitalists to fail, the U.S. dollar itself might fail.

Eric Fry
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

Eric J. Fry
Eric J. Fry has been a specialist in international equities since the early 1980s. He was a professional portfolio manager for more than 10 years, specializing in international investment strategies and short- selling. Mr. Fry launched the sometimes-abrasive, mostly entertaining and always insightful Rude Awakening.
Eric J. Fry

Latest posts by Eric J. Fry (see all)



  1. Should The US government bail out American corporations?

    Does corporate America share its profits with the tax payers? The answer is absolutely not.
    Do they share the profits with their employees? The executives are paid millions.
    The US Government should bail out all corporations large and small is that right? The answer is no. If it is a viable business, they can raise the money from investors, if not, let them close shop.
    If the government decides to bail them out if should be at a cost (like shares in the company) where the government will make money and have a say in running the company. Even better have a public referendum where the voters decide.
    Carmakers want money from the government; the financial institutions want money – where does it stop?
    It is about time corporate America should learn they have to stand on their own feet. Where is corporate America financial responsibility?
    They claim the government is abusing its financial responsibility; it seems Corporate America is no better. They also go to their workers to take a pay cut, is that fair? It seems the little guys are the ones that always pay the price for corporate financial abuse and miss-management.
    Other corporations in the world are not asking to be bailed out – they go out of business.
    Jay Draiman
    The corporate barracudas have no conscience they will step on anyone, stab anyone in the back and fudge the numbers to climb up the corporate ladder and receive the hefty bonuses.
    As family values have declined in the last half a century so has corporate integrity and honesty, it seems that corporate America will do almost anything for the buck ($) no holes barred.
    What a shame that corporate America has sunk so low.
    The government is no different, honesty and integrity is a foreign language, they only serve the special interest groups. (We all know why).
    What happened to the American people who placed their trust in the government? (The public officials they voted for).
    We are faced constantly with another corporate or governmental scandal of wrongdoing. When is the American public going to wake up and demand an honest government and honest corporate America? Americans wake up before it is too late.
    Jay Draiman


    September 25, 2008

Leave a Reply

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to letters@dailyreckoning.com.au