Fred C. Kelly Declares the Crowd is Always Wrong

Reddit

What can investors expect next year?

We can expect that the crowd will probably be wrong. Or as Fred C. Kelly put it more emphatically: “The crowd always loses because the crowd is always wrong. It is wrong because it behaves normally.” Kelly wrote this in a little 1930 book titled Why You Win or Lose: the Psychology of Speculation. We’ll see what Kelly meant below.

We don’t know all that much about Kelly. We know he was a writer, traveler and breeder of dogs. He also played the stock market. “For several years now,” he tells us in his book, “including much of 1929, I have had the astounding experience of being in the stock market most of the time without losing anything. It would have been a wonderful adventure even if I had lost, for I had opportunity to learn of quirks and foibles of human nature in the greatest human laboratory on earth. It was like going to college, tuition free, with an occasional bonus for encouragement.”

We should all be so enthusiastic in our pursuits. Kelly’s main interest was in what goes on between the ears. As the subtitle of his book suggests, he was interested in the mental aspects of speculating in markets. Kelly’s key to success, in his estimation, largely turned on his ability to not do what everyone else was doing. In other words, he didn’t follow the crowd.

This is what he meant by the crowd behaving normally. Normally, people tend to do what other people say they should do. Normally, people like to look for a consensus of expert opinion and then back that consensus.

In most things in life, that works much of the time. If ten home inspectors tell you that your house needs a new roof, you can safely conclude that it does. If eight out of ten auto mechanics tell you need to replace your timing belt, you probably should. But trusting in the consensus opinion tends to work poorly in financial markets. If 10 out of 10 experts say you should buy tech stocks, you probably shouldn’t. And if eight out of 10 say you should avoid utilities, then you should probably take a look at buying them.

That’s why a recent poll by Barron’s makes me a little nervous about 2010. Barron’s asked 12 experts – all strategists from blue-blood firms like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan – what they like and don’t like for the next twelve months. There were lots of mixed opinions, but every single one of the experts predicted the stock market would advance in 2010.

The consensus was almost as universally bullish in the late 1990s, just as an epic bear market was about to begin. During the late 1990s, stocks were as popular as they were expensive. In 1999, the S&P 500 traded for 44 times earnings – an all-time high. During the ensuing ten years, the S&P 500 delivered a total return of approximately zero!

As we head into 2010, the stock market trades for about 20 times earnings. That’s not cheap. But it’s also not horribly expensive, either, especially if you consider that we are in a recession and profits may well improve big-time over the next few years. Either way, I do not make investment decisions based on the valuation of the overall stock market. I look at individual stocks. There is nearly always something worthwhile to buy in any market. Sometimes good ideas are more plentiful and sometimes they are more scarce, but I let my bottoms-up rooting around tell me what’s what.

At the moment, my research is turning up more bargains in the smaller- cap stocks than the big stocks. In my investment letter, Mayer’s Special Situations, I focus on small and underfollowed stocks. During 2009 only one of the stocks I recommended to my subscribers had a market cap greater than $1 billion. We picked up a debt-free emerging iron ore producer, now up 119%. We also grabbed a debt-free nat gas producer with lots of shale gas, now up 120%. We’re up 91% on a small Brazilian gold miner. We closed out a double on a Mexican silver miner earlier in the year.

Those were some of the best picks, but we had many other solid market beaters with great upside remaining. I look forward to finding more such small-cap goodies in 2010.

Regards,

Chris Mayer
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

Chris Mayer
Chris Mayer is a veteran of the banking industry, specifically in the area of corporate lending. A financial writer since 1998, Mr. Mayer's essays have appeared in a wide variety of publications, from the Mises.org Daily Article series to here in The Daily Reckoning. He is the editor of Mayer's Special Situations and Capital and Crisis - formerly the Fleet Street Letter.
Reddit

Comments

  1. The Pittsburgh Steelers did again.

    On January 20, 2009 I posted this to DRA:

    What the Pittsburgh Steelers predict for the stockmarket:

    History suggests that the Dow Jones Industrial Average is on the cusp of a 70%+ rally over the next couple of years. It may even pass the 2007 high.

    Two examples from history are 1975 for the 70%+ rally and 1927 for the new Dow Jones high.

    Later on my website I included this comment:

    “Since the first Super Bowl was contested in 1967, the average annual return for the S&P 500 index has been 25 percent in the six years the Steelers competed, regardless of whether the team won or lost, according to Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor’s” (Ros Krasny, Steelers in Super Bowl may bring luck to investors, reuters.com, January 30, 2009).

    The S&P at the close of 2009 was up 23.5% for the year and up 65% from the March low.

    The Steelers would have to be very lucky to gain a wild card to the play-offs this season. So they may not provide a guide for this year.

    Reply
  2. Caw blimey!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to letters@dailyreckoning.com.au