Comments on: Geothermal and the Energy Policy http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/geothermal-and-the-energy-policy/2009/04/30/ An independent perspective on the Australian and global investment markets Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:27:32 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: William http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/geothermal-and-the-energy-policy/2009/04/30/comment-page-1/#comment-76460 William Sat, 02 May 2009 05:32:34 +0000 http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/?p=5836#comment-76460 Although am a climate change skeptic, I am all for clean air. If that means paying more for clean energy so be it. Pollution producing energy suppliers and their customers get a subsidy in that they pay nothing for the detrimental effects on the environment and human health. Make it mandatory for them to contain their wastes and we'll see how competitive they really are. Although am a climate change skeptic, I am all for clean air. If that means paying more for clean energy so be it. Pollution producing energy suppliers and their customers get a subsidy in that they pay nothing for the detrimental effects on the environment and human health. Make it mandatory for them to contain their wastes and we'll see how competitive they really are.

]]> By: Tim http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/geothermal-and-the-energy-policy/2009/04/30/comment-page-1/#comment-76403 Tim Fri, 01 May 2009 09:54:47 +0000 http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/?p=5836#comment-76403 The inference re: scientists publishing reports/studies/evidence of CC because of grants is offensive to scientists. The VAST majority are reporting what's happening. I really value DR, but the increasing condescension toward the CC/GW proposition is both unwarranted, not relevant (to the DR) and incorrect. This is not a Yes/No discussion anymore, it's a "how bad will it be, and what can we do" discussion. Cheers tim The inference re: scientists publishing reports/studies/evidence of CC because of grants is offensive to scientists.

The VAST majority are reporting what's happening.

I really value DR, but the increasing condescension toward the CC/GW proposition is both unwarranted, not relevant (to the DR) and incorrect.

This is not a Yes/No discussion anymore, it's a "how bad will it be, and what can we do" discussion.

Cheers
tim

]]>