<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gisele Bundchen, Warren Buffett Reject the US Dollar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/gisele-rejects-dollar/2007/11/08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/gisele-rejects-dollar/2007/11/08/</link>
	<description>An independent perspective on the Australian and global investment markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:27:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/gisele-rejects-dollar/2007/11/08/comment-page-1/#comment-4483</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/gisele-rejects-dollar/2007/11/08/#comment-4483</guid>
		<description>I can see your point Colin, but if you look at the nice Daily Reckoning logo at the top of the page it states:
&quot;A freewheeling Web site for libertarians, gold bugs and doom enthusiasts of every stripe&quot;

Any hyped-up reporting needs to be taken with a grain of salt. On one-hand we have economists stating that the US is in a bull-market or that it is not in any trouble, and here we have some doom-sayers that seem to have a better grip on reality.

I know who i will listen to...numbers lie, theories lie, but the keen observer with nothing to gain other than a readership (and critics)...well, i will at least listen.

And if anyone could accurately predict exactly when these things can happen. You can only look at the signs, the decisions are up to the individual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see your point Colin, but if you look at the nice Daily Reckoning logo at the top of the page it states:<br />
"A freewheeling Web site for libertarians, gold bugs and doom enthusiasts of every stripe"</p>
<p>Any hyped-up reporting needs to be taken with a grain of salt. On one-hand we have economists stating that the US is in a bull-market or that it is not in any trouble, and here we have some doom-sayers that seem to have a better grip on reality.</p>
<p>I know who i will listen to...numbers lie, theories lie, but the keen observer with nothing to gain other than a readership (and critics)...well, i will at least listen.</p>
<p>And if anyone could accurately predict exactly when these things can happen. You can only look at the signs, the decisions are up to the individual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/gisele-rejects-dollar/2007/11/08/comment-page-1/#comment-4472</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 04:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/gisele-rejects-dollar/2007/11/08/#comment-4472</guid>
		<description>Ambigious words like &#039;doomed&#039; should be banned by any financial commentators. Reasoning being, they never own to being wrong 2-3 years later when the opposite to their prediction comes true. They just cite they were talking on a different time frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ambigious words like 'doomed' should be banned by any financial commentators. Reasoning being, they never own to being wrong 2-3 years later when the opposite to their prediction comes true. They just cite they were talking on a different time frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.220 seconds -->
