Does the Government Want More Control Over Your Super and Retirement Income?

businessman hand writing retirement on white board

Leading Australian experts have established a new think tank focused on post-retirement super policy. The Committee for Sustainable Retirement Incomes is an independent group.  They will look at making sure public contribution to retirement incomes is as efficient as possible.

Their first project was a submission to the government, released today. Unlike past reports by other groups, they’ve looked at both super tax and the cost of pensions. Their recommendations could have serious implications for how the government will treat your super after you retire.

 What ‘sustainable retirement incomes’ really means

In this context, ‘sustainable’ means cheaper for the government.

Superannuation is meant to provide an income for you after you retire. Sounds simple, right? Unfortunately, people don’t always use it this way. According to some reports, super accounts provide a tax haven for the rich. For example, super funds get a discount on capital gains tax. This means a self-managed super fund can, say, buy and sell commercial property for a profit without paying as much tax as a real estate investment trust.

The committee has recommended that a review of the age pension means test. They want a means test that ‘better compels people to use their superannuation’ for retirement purposes. In other words, they want to make it harder to get a pension if you’ve got enough of your own money to live on.

Currently, a home-owning couple can get a part pension if their assets are less than $1,151,000. This doesn’t include the value of their home.

It’s not clear yet what changes the government might look in to. They might reduce the assets limit to an amount that would allow a modest average return each year. For example, last year the average median fund returned around 6%. According to the ASFA, a couple needs just over $58,000 a year to live comfortably. This means their retirement assets (if held in said median fund) could be worth just $967,000 and still not restrict their lifestyle.

They might also look at tax rules. The committee said that an ‘option [between full marginal tax and no tax] could ensure a more equitable distribution within the context of the current level of tax concessions.’ Getting rid of tax breaks could target those whose income streams are higher than necessary. For example, in 2012–13 there were 24,000 retirees with super account balances of over $2 million each. They received combined super stream incomes of $5.2 billion. That’s an average of over $216,000 each. All tax free.

 How your retirement could suffer

There’s no need for you to worry — yet. The government hasn’t acted on the committee’s submission yet. You may not find out more until at least the May budget.

The impact on your super will depend on your retirement income goals. If you’re just aiming to live comfortably, reforms probably won’t affect you. Same goes if you don’t plan to claim a pension. If you want to maximise your retirement income, keep an eye out for changes to super tax rules.

Eva Mellors
Contributor, The Daily Reckoning

The Daily Reckoning
The Daily Reckoning offers an independent and critical perspective on the Australian and global investment markets. Slightly offbeat and far from institutional, The Daily Reckoning delivers you straight-forward, humorous, and useful investment insights from a world wide network of analysts, contrarians, and successful investors. Founded in 1999, The Daily Reckoning is published in 7 countries with a worldwide readership of almost 1 million people.

Leave a Reply

1 Comment on "Does the Government Want More Control Over Your Super and Retirement Income?"

Notify of

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
slewie the pi-rat
slewie the pi-rat
1 year 6 months ago
don’t give up! point out that they are changing the rules for EVERYBODY with some B.S. 51% of Corpo-Fascist puppets. screw ’em! tell them you’ve had it, with this rule-change crap! if they don’t KNOW what they’re doing at this point, just tell these corporate lackeys to sit on their blankeys and suck their freaking thumbs til it’s time to go home! ——————————————— slewie’s ‘FLATION Report! [for Tues., April 14, 2015; US Dollars, only] BLOOMBERG COMMODITY INDEX [on top, again!]: 99.5 +0.6 (+0.61%) UD Dollar Index: 98.79 -0.36 [i think]. INflation! actually this was right on a little INflation yesterday,… Read more »
Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to