<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hugo Chavez: Up is down&#8230; in is out&#8230; and dumb is smart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/hugo-chavez/2007/05/05/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/hugo-chavez/2007/05/05/</link>
	<description>An independent perspective on the Australian and global investment markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:39:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/hugo-chavez/2007/05/05/comment-page-1/#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/hugo-chavez/2007/05/05/#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>This is in response to JLTN.  Why would it ever be in a companies best interest to say sell some of its product at reduced prices to the local market?  I think you are looking at the situation backwards.  It is the the governments best interest to cooperate with the company.  If the company can sell good X abroad for a sizable profit it will keep trying to make more of good X.  This means more Venezuelans will be employed.  The alternative is that Chavez can nationalize it, distribute good X to the people, and watch as the company slowly is ground to dust and then no one has jobs or good X either.  
  As for Japan, it has been stagnant for about a decade now so I don&#039;t think that is a great example.  They are also moving towards privatization in their financial services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in response to JLTN.  Why would it ever be in a companies best interest to say sell some of its product at reduced prices to the local market?  I think you are looking at the situation backwards.  It is the the governments best interest to cooperate with the company.  If the company can sell good X abroad for a sizable profit it will keep trying to make more of good X.  This means more Venezuelans will be employed.  The alternative is that Chavez can nationalize it, distribute good X to the people, and watch as the company slowly is ground to dust and then no one has jobs or good X either.<br />
  As for Japan, it has been stagnant for about a decade now so I don't think that is a great example.  They are also moving towards privatization in their financial services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLTN</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/hugo-chavez/2007/05/05/comment-page-1/#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>JLTN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 11:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/hugo-chavez/2007/05/05/#comment-2081</guid>
		<description>You ask, &quot;Can anyone remember a case when nationalizing a major industry led to greater efficiency, higher profits, more output, lower prices, or happier customers?&quot;

I don&#039;t really know my history on this topic but is it possible that if companies would cooperate with the Venezuelan  government that they could be profitable? Perhaps not as profitable in the short term but what about over time? Look at Japan where the government and industry are bond like husband and wife. I mean, it&#039;s pretty common knowledge that Japanese men are married to their companies. The government gets its cut and business and society at large get theirs. People in Japan have pretty secure jobs if they work in the blue chips here. Think Panasonic, Toyota, Sharp, Nissan, etc. So, government interaction with business isn&#039;t necessarily bad. The Japanese have a pretty good life style. You don&#039;t see homeless too much, people are out shopping, eating, traveling, and, most important: working. They are busy here and on tight schedules. 

Anyway, what&#039;s this all got to do with the Chavez administration? Well, perhaps they&#039;re trying to build a strong and independent society just like the rest of the world would like to have. America has it, Japan, Europe have it. China&#039;s on it&#039;s way to it, Russian and India too. Perhaps these stocks will do well in the long term for patient investors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ask, "Can anyone remember a case when nationalizing a major industry led to greater efficiency, higher profits, more output, lower prices, or happier customers?"</p>
<p>I don't really know my history on this topic but is it possible that if companies would cooperate with the Venezuelan  government that they could be profitable? Perhaps not as profitable in the short term but what about over time? Look at Japan where the government and industry are bond like husband and wife. I mean, it's pretty common knowledge that Japanese men are married to their companies. The government gets its cut and business and society at large get theirs. People in Japan have pretty secure jobs if they work in the blue chips here. Think Panasonic, Toyota, Sharp, Nissan, etc. So, government interaction with business isn't necessarily bad. The Japanese have a pretty good life style. You don't see homeless too much, people are out shopping, eating, traveling, and, most important: working. They are busy here and on tight schedules. </p>
<p>Anyway, what's this all got to do with the Chavez administration? Well, perhaps they're trying to build a strong and independent society just like the rest of the world would like to have. America has it, Japan, Europe have it. China's on it's way to it, Russian and India too. Perhaps these stocks will do well in the long term for patient investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.225 seconds -->
