Human Cryogenics Comes Closer to Reality with “Glassy Water”
Science has long been drawn to the idea of human cryogenics - preserving a human by freezing him in such a way that he can be thawed out later, good as new.
Both scientists and science fiction authors have long mulled the possibilities associated with freezing a person, leaving them in a kind of suspended animation for a long time, and then unfreezing them back to life.
Already, companies are offering human cryogenic services whereby you can freeze your whole body or (for the budget conscious) just the head until some future time.
The theory is that, eventually, whatever ails you — be it illness or simply the decrepitude of aging — will be curable. At that time, the custodians of your body will be directed to thaw it out.
You may be wondering why someone would freeze just their head. After all, one's quality-of-life would be somewhat restricted without the torso. The theory is that recent accomplishments in re-growing body parts of mice (salamanders naturally do it) will someday be extended to people.
Why freeze a damaged or aged body when you can wake up to a brand-new perfect one? Apart from recent successes with the cloning of body parts, proponents of nanotechnology argue that within 20 years or so it will be possible to design microscopic machines that scour your body for defects. When these "nano bots" find such defects, they will instantly correct them, thereby restoring your physiology to that of a vital 20-year-old.
In addition to the potential medical benefits, those who believe that we can never surpass the speed of light believe that human cryogenics suspension may hold the answer to deep space travel.
Under this scenario, a team of explorers or even a group of colonists would be frozen early in their journey from Earth. Upon arrival in the destination star system, the ship's computer systems and robotics with thaw out the people, ready for their new life.
From an investment standpoint, I'm far more interested in the medical applications of human cryogenics than the space travel ones. They are, pardon the pun, a lot closer to hand.
So, what does the new research say to us about this possibility? ScienceDaily reports that recent findings at the University of Helsinki support the possibility of cryopreservation without formation of ice crystals. If true, this would be a crucial development in human cryogenics because it's formation of the ice crystals that ruptures delicate cell membranes.
Surprisingly, the report declares that water is "still one of the least understood of all liquids despite a century of intensive study." Dr. Anatoli Bogdan of University of Helsinki has focused his research upon an exotic form of water called "glassy water."
Published in the ACS Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Dr. Bogdan's research found that by slowly super cooling glassy water it could be reduced to cryonic temperatures without formation of ice crystals.
Dr. Bogdan commented, "It may seem fantastic, but the fact that in aqueous solution, [the] water component can be slowly supercooled to the glassy state and warmed back without the crystallization implies that, in principle, if the suitable cyroprotectant is created, cells in plants and living matter could withstand a large supercooling and survive."
Even though I'm a technology optimist, I don't expect to see commercial human cryogenic applications of this new technology in the next one or two years. First, the work needs to be translated into lower organisms such as mice. If they can be supercooled and restored, it will make front-page headlines.
Even after successful test with mice, human tests would require FDA protocols and would take years to identify test subjects and run the experiment. One delaying factor would be the nature of the technology itself: Since it can only be ethically applied to people who have terminal disease, they cannot be thawed out until the disease has been cured.
Bottom line: I expect human cryogenics to have great significance in about 10 to 15 years. Meanwhile, I'll be watching for the law of unintended consequences to kick in — some bright researcher may come up with a shorter-term animal-based application that has big dollar signs associated with it.
Jonathan Kolber
for The Daily Reckoning Australia
P.S. to get The Daily Reckoning direct to your inbox sign up to our free e-mail newsletter or if you prefer to use RSS, subscribe to the Daily Reckoning RSS feed.
Related Articles:
- None Found
About the Author
The Daily Reckoning offers an independent and critical perspective on the Australian and global investment markets. Slightly offbeat and far from institutional, The Daily Reckoning delivers you straight-forward, humorous, and useful investment insights from a world wide network of analysts, contrarians, and successful investors. Founded in 1999, The Daily Reckoning is published in 7 countries with a worldwide readership of almost 1 million people.
Comment by Hector Gonzalez on 7 November 2007:
I think the study of Cryogenics is brilliant and I apluad the effort of scientists that are trying the issue. What I do know though, is that the body of an animal can not be compared to a human one. Also to expierment this on a human being without knowing the results is going to be very dangerous. One thing that everyone is forgetting that imperfection will always be present. The only one that can bring perfection back is god and no one on earth will ever have gods power to do such a thing. So my conclusion is that its a great try for humans to try to save some years on the human body but all efforts will be exhausted due to the lack of power and mental capacity of imperfect humans trying to make something work that only a perfect source can do, which is god. Im not trying to put down the idea im just letting know the true facts.
Thank You
Comment by Tanner on 11 November 2007:
God unfortunately has contributed nothing to the advancement of technology. The notion that we should "leave it up to god" actually will do nothing but impede our technological advancements. It is determination and hard work that has lead humans to many advancements that were thought impossible. Imagine explaining the idea of 3-D to a 2-D object, doesn't work out too well. Science will do as it's always done and trample over those who doubt it.
Comment by Tanner on 23 November 2007:
Oh... "the body of a human can't be compared to a human one"? Someone forgot to tell this fellar that humans are mammals... we're warm blooded 'animals'. Humans have tested on animals for centuries.
Comment by Andrew on 2 January 2009:
Hi,
I would like to see in my life time some huge advancement like the subject of freezing humans to prolong life or a cure to cancer or humans to evolve to a longer living body and time travel. Going through some old photos I would give anything to beable to meet some of my relatives who died before I was born.No one will admit that Aliens Exist.
My conncern is any huge discovery will not be released to the general public and kept secret.
Comment by E.T. on 24 March 2009:
someone seriously just said aliens. lol!
Comment by Rayna on 3 April 2009:
This stuff is prety cool. Im out here for a school project and cryogenics is so interesting.... and wierd to think i could die and come back to life one day. Thenk you
Comment by shane on 15 April 2009:
Hi, to those of us who have seen combat and were injured, losing apart of our mobility and lively hood would praise this technology.
Thinking that we could be frozen and awaken when medical technology has caught up and with possibilities can restore our lives to a more whole state with out the disabilities that plauges us, is a true god send.
Comment by petermcuk on 7 May 2009:
The problem with this is that while you are waiting for the technology to revive and cure you those you love are ageing and dying in 'real time'
Also, the big problem with space travel is that once you get beyond a certain point communications become impractical. Imagine having a conversation with even a 20 minute gap between question and reply. As for (inevitable) technical problems - these would have to be solved without reference to the team on earth.
Finally, the new Toby Litt book explores the idea that a ship travelling to a distant destination could be overtaken by another vessel which has the advantage of new technology developed since the original ship left earth.
Fascinating subject!
Comment by karma on 4 August 2009:
its a great idea but come on lets be real huh.it would be very nice to wake up 20 to 40 years from now but what will happen to my knowledge,type of civilisation i followed and plenty other things since i'll be waiting to be thawed out things would change and i would be completely lost when i wake up.is the temperture maintained where i'll be frozen?what happens if the machine breaks and i start melting?oh gosh i could go on and on.i think this project should be closely looked and thought about from all angles it be dangerous at apart from being great.
Comment by John Marx on 15 August 2009:
I've always been fascinated by cloning, cryogenics or anything that the mind can conceive. Our dreams are stepping stones to a future reality. It's been proven countless times. In order to solve a problem a goal-minded group of people must look for any given solution from all angles. My take on the success of crygenics is this: As soon as a human body is shut down, frozen or forced to suspend any natural functions; i.e. suspending it's temporal function, the natural response of our core eternal being is to escape what has ceased to be of use. Death occurs. Strangely, this does not apply to animals, insects or mammals. The solution here lies with finding the equinox between ones spirit (or soul) leaving the body, keeping the brain and heart functioning, however slow and suspending the rest of the extremities at a level where cells will not start dying.
Perfect cryo stasis is not possible for a human being, but at best a slowing down of the ageing process in a state of deep sleep can occur up to about 85%. In addition, an electrical pulse, much like a diffribulator for a heart-attack victim must be applied to the brain and heart intermittantly to remind the spirit (or soul) not to evacuate. That should suffice for a trip to Mars and back. Our brain solely function by electrical pulses, so I can imagine that the scientists designing these brain and heart "reminder-to-keep-working" diffribulators had better know there maths. I've been electrocuted into a near-death experience before. Not nice. Imagine having to endure that on a six month space flight without being able to wake up and scream your pain and surprise to the world.
As for cloning; who cares? My morals are flexible on that issue. You can clone flesh at your own peril. It's been done. The mind reals at what slips between the cracks of a copy, but the question is; are we cloning for organ harvesting, missing body parts, to build an army like in 'Star Wars - The clone wars?' or does some reckless scientist want to be published legally? Go ahead! Clone to your hearts content Mr. Scientist, but if that clone thinks and reasons, displaying all the five human characteristic senses, as well as a 6th sense, then you have extended your family and you must raise him or her to be a son or a daughter. Any questions? What was that? Overpopulation? What can I say except 'I told you so.'
Comment by devaddy on 8 November 2009:
There are other questions. What is suspended animation? What is memory and how much of it is left when not stimulated for 20-30 years? If reincarnation is a true phenomenon, how long does it take? If a soul is reborn to another life before a person is reawakened, when they do awake, what is to become of the soul being in more than 1 place at the same time?
Comment by Chris on 3 February 2010:
While I certainly man no disrespect to anyone or their religion, some of us seem to forget that religion in and of itself, was created, by man, and is therefore fallible. I would most definitely like to think that there is a God, much of what we "know" about religion was written by our forefathers. With so many different versions of "God" and religion in this world, how are we to know which is correct, and which are not? I bring this up only to point out that we have zero FACTUAL knowledge of the "soul" or a great number of other theological ideas and beliefs. There are always potential dangers to everything we do, be it simply driving to the store for milk and eggs, or searching for the answers to defeating viruses and cancer. While i certainly don't believe "God" would care very much for the idea of us becoming immortal, I am simply unable to believe that He would have issue with us using science and technology to preserve life, to restore or give the gift of "normal" bodily function to those injured or born with defect, or to allow us to reach for the stars that have so long seemed just out of reach. So many things through the ages have been believed to be impossible, and yet, time and time again, human ingenuity and perseverance have allowed us to find the doors to our dreams. If there truly is a God, and He can forgive us our trespass into his domains, then may He allow us to find the door to this dream as well.
Comment by Great Journey on 17 February 2010:
Excellent point i am also interested in the thought of cryogenic suspension and cloning. And i also wish to see what future mankind has for itself, but ultimately god's decides whether we live or die this i believe to be the worlds one and only truth. whether your religious and scientific you must always to battle with death. but what i think is that both the big bang and god's creation myth both have merit. in the beginning there was darkness but the compacted energy burst into the big bang or when god breathed life into the universe creating the heavens the stars, galaxies, planets, and many other mysterious entities. The crab nebula fueled by the energy of the big bang created the sun, 9 planets, and a precious jewel called earth. The sun gave birth to bacteria which evolved into both plant and animal life eventually gave birth to man kind and so on and in the universe death has always been there but in death a new life is born which will pass on like his forefathers have....oh sorry i like philosophy but my point is you can prolong it as much as you can but all things that live must come an end.
just my opinion though.