<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week Marked the Six-Month Anniversary of the Fed&#8217;s First Cut to US Interest Rates During the Current World Banking Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/interest-rates-banking-crisis/2008/02/25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/interest-rates-banking-crisis/2008/02/25/</link>
	<description>An independent perspective on the Australian and global investment markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:39:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/interest-rates-banking-crisis/2008/02/25/comment-page-1/#comment-9684</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/interest-rates-banking-crisis/2008/02/25/#comment-9684</guid>
		<description>Once again terrific info and analysis. Inflation is bad news for PE ratios and recessions are bad news for revs, margins and earnings. They come in a package--the old double whammy. That is why you could by stocks so cheap in the early 80s--low multiple &amp; depressed earnings. Looks like that might be in store for us somewhere down the road a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again terrific info and analysis. Inflation is bad news for PE ratios and recessions are bad news for revs, margins and earnings. They come in a package--the old double whammy. That is why you could by stocks so cheap in the early 80s--low multiple &amp; depressed earnings. Looks like that might be in store for us somewhere down the road a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.222 seconds -->
