• Featured
  • Australasia
  • The Americas
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • Market
  • Precious Metals
  • Resources
  • Currencies
  • Real Estate
  • The Bonner Diaries

Is Gold at $1000 a Bargain…Or a Trap?


By Bill Bonner • October 9th, 2009 • Related Articles • Filed Under

About the Author

Bill BonnerBest-selling investment author Bill Bonner is the founder and president of Agora Publishing, one of the world's most successful consumer newsletter companies. Owner of both Fleet Street Publications and MoneyWeek magazine in the UK, he is also author of the free daily e-mail The Daily Reckoning.

See All Articles by This Author

  • Is Gold Going Up Because People Fear Inflation?
  • Gold is More Like a Religion or a Political Position
  • Feds’ Plan is to Reflate the Economy
  • Markets Rise While the Economy Sinks
  • The Economy is Getting Worse Not Better
Filed Under: Market • Precious Metals • The Americas
Tags: Barclays Capital • bear market • bull market • consumer boom • consumer economy • credit contraction • credit cycle • deflation • federal government • feds • financial industry • Gold • gold investors • inflation • job market • labor market • obama • private sector • recovery • stock market investor • tax credit • U.S. Economy • united states

"Gold continues to climb...stoked by inflation worries," says a headline in the International Herald Tribune.

Yesterday, it touched a new record - $1,050 - even as the dollar rose, oil slumped under $70 and stocks dipped very slightly.

Well, what do you expect? The United States added $1 trillion to its monetary base in the last year or so. The federal government is running a deficit of $1.7 trillion this year. And along comes Barack Obama with an idea to stimulate employment - spend more money! This time, Obama's plan is a kind of 'Cash for Workers' program...in which businesses get a tax credit for hiring new employees.

Gold investors must think the new program will be the straw they've been waiting for. Government has piled on bales of costly new initiatives on this poor camel's back. Still, he stands up straight.

So, is gold at $1000 a bargain...or a trap? Or both.

We begin by asking: where's the inflation? We don't see any inflation. What we do see is deflation.

Barclays Capital says gold could go to $1,500. We don't know where they got that number. It could go to $15,000 for all we know. Or it could go down, too.

Our guess is that it will go down enough scare the bejesus out of speculators. Then, it will soar.

But, hey, we're just guessing - along with everyone else.

Sooner or later gold is probably headed to the lunatic moon. We're sticking with the yellow metal. We don't want to miss that ride.

But when?

Ah...we're going to stick our necks out and say "eventually." We're sure we're right about this. Just don't ask us for more precision; we have none. And what bothers us is that between eventually and now there could be a lot of time and a lot of trouble. And one trouble that could come up pretty fast is another crash in the stock market.

If the stock markets of the world take another dive...like they did last year...gold will probably go down with them. Not as much, but down nonetheless. So, if we were speculating...we'd probably be short gold and short stocks too. We'd bet against bonds too - even though we think they will probably go up in the short run. The smart, long term money - in both stocks and bonds - is probably on the short side.

Here at The Daily Reckoning, however, we never speculate - except in print. As to ideas about how the world works we have plenty. We speculate daily. As to gold, stocks and commodities, we prefer to hold onto our long-term positions.

What seems fairly sure to us is that this recovery is a fraud. It's a mountebank and a flimflam.

And now approaches a moment of truth - earnings announcements. Stock market investors bid up shares on the theory that sales and profits would rise. Will they? We don't think so.

We think sales are going to be disappointing...and earnings will be even worse. If so, we'll see analysts begin to change their expectations...and announce that the results are "not as bad as expected."

If we get a few really bad announcements - with results much worse than expected - it could sink the rally. Then again, if we're surprised with exceptionally good reports...it could send the market in the other direction.

Good results will also cause us here at The Daily Reckoning to question our position. Maybe the economy is not sinking into a chronic depression, after all. Could we be wrong?

Ha ha...are you kidding, dear reader? Of course, we can be wrong. When we were younger we were uncertain about things. But now that we're older, we're not so sure.

Here is what we're pretty sure about:

1) The credit cycle has topped out.

Americans are saving - think of the poor boomers, 10 years older but not a penny richer than they were in 1999. Stocks have gone nowhere but down in real terms. Houses hit a high in 2006...now, they're off 30%...and still going down. Jobs? Forget it...there are already 15 million people who are unemployed and about 200,000 more every month. The job market is unlikely to recover for another 6-13 years - that is, after many of the boomers are retired! And if you are lucky enough to have a job, you're not likely to get a raise...not with so much spare capacity in the labor market.

Under those conditions, a consumer boom is very unlikely.

2) We know that a period of credit contraction is deflationary.

Prices go down as demand falls. Buyers disappear from the malls that once knew them, while the factories that produce stuff grow dusty and quiet.

But we know the feds hate falling prices. And we know they are taking extraordinary actions to get prices to go up. So far, their efforts have been a giant flop. Prices are falling in the United States at the fastest pace since the '50s.

Most of the feds' efforts have been directed towards keeping the bankers fat and happy...and getting themselves a bigger share of America's output. They took funds designed to relaunch the US economy, for example, and used them to buy themselves a big position in the auto industry, the financial industry and the insurance industry.

3) We know too, by the way they conducted themselves in those affairs, that the feds have become much more aggressive...throwing their weight around in the private sector as never before.

What we don't know is how this affects markets in the short term. So far, consumer prices are falling, but the stock market is enjoying a bounce. It is a real, new bull market? Or just a bear market bounce? It is probably a bear market bounce...but it has been going for long enough that we have to at least consider the idea that it is a genuine bull market. That's why the numbers from this quarter are important...they'll tell us if the companies themselves are expanding earnings fast enough to justify investors' optimism.

4) We know too that there is a whole lot of 'flation going on.

We are just unable to tell you what kind of 'flation it is. The monetary base is way up - it increased by $1 trillion in the last 12 months. But the money-in-circulation has barely budged. The feds give the banks overnight loans at practically zero interest. Then, the banks lend it back to the feds at nearly 4% more.

What happens to it then? Well, what do you think...it is wasted on typical federal government scams and humbugs.

So, relatively little of the money actually ends up in the consumer economy. And so, we can't tell you whether the 'flation will have a 'in' prefix or a 'de' prefix. They're just two letters. But they will make a whole alphabet of difference to the economy and to your investments.

5) Most important, we are dead sure that the people running America's financial policies are jackasses.

We say that with all due respect, which is probably not much. They have only one idea - and it is a bad one. They think economies are improved by more consumer spending. They don't seem to care why consumers occasionally cut back on their spending. All that matters to them is finding ways to get the consumer shopping again. So they try tax cuts and government spending...bailouts and boondoggles...zero interest lending and federal takeovers...cash for clunkers, cash for houses, cash for employees....

..trillions worth of claptrap and folderol. But what a nuisance! The fool consumer still won't shop!

But they're determined to keep trying. That's why we can be pretty sure that, eventually, they'll get inflation rates up. One way or another. And then, gold at $1000 will seem like an outrageous bargain.

Until next time,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
please wait...
Rating: 8.1/10 (15 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Is Gold at $1000 a Bargain...Or a Trap?, 8.1 out of 10 based on 15 ratings



P.S. to get The Daily Reckoning direct to your inbox sign up to our free e-mail newsletter or if you prefer to use RSS, subscribe to the Daily Reckoning RSS feed.

Related Articles:

  • Is Gold Going Up Because People Fear Inflation?
  • Gold is More Like a Religion or a Political Position
  • Feds’ Plan is to Reflate the Economy
  • Markets Rise While the Economy Sinks
  • The Economy is Getting Worse Not Better

About the Author

Bill BonnerBest-selling investment author Bill Bonner is the founder and president of Agora Publishing, one of the world's most successful consumer newsletter companies. Owner of both Fleet Street Publications and MoneyWeek magazine in the UK, he is also author of the free daily e-mail The Daily Reckoning.

See All Posts by This Author

There Are 4 Responses So Far. »

  1. Comment by Dan on 9 October 2009:

    Spot on Bill, spot on!

    VA:F [1.9.11_1134]
    please wait...
    Rating: 3.5/5 (2 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.11_1134]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. Comment by Greg Atkinson on 9 October 2009:

    Dan why spot on? Is the world the U.S?

    VA:F [1.9.11_1134]
    please wait...
    Rating: 2.3/5 (3 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.11_1134]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. Comment by Stuart Davies on 10 October 2009:

    Bill, you simply refuse to drop the obfuscation, don't you? Let me quote you here: "The monetary base is way up - it increased by $1 trillion in the last 12 months. But the money-in-circulation has barely budged. The feds give the banks overnight loans at practically zero interest. Then, the banks lend it back to the feds at nearly 4% more."
    Here you are once again playing that tired game (along with the big bidness/mainstream "economist" crowd) of perpetuating the confusion by equating the fed with the FEDS. Let's get this crucial fact straight: the Federal Reserve Bank is owned by by the regional reserve banks (53 percent is owned by the New York Reserve Bank), which in turn are owned by banks within their respective regions. In other words, Bill, the Fed is owned by the banksters themselves, as you know perfectly well. In spite of the fig leaf of having the federal reserve board chairman nominated by the president and confirmed by the senate, the actual control of federal reserve policy is exercised of, by, and for the bankers.
    So, how about putting that little follow-the-money concept in a more accurate format? Here's my version: The monetary base is way up - it increased by $1 trillion in the last 12 months. But the money-in-circulation has barely budged. The fed loans trillions to the FEDS with money they create from thin air. The FEDS then give the banks and their co-conspirators like AIG massive bailouts as punishment for the staggering criminal fraud they have perpetrated, and the fed gives the banks overnight loans at practically zero interest. Then, the banks lend it back to the FEDS at nearly 4% more." Sound about right?
    I think you are on to a very important tangent with your observation "The monetary base is way up - it increased by $1 trillion in the last 12 months. But the money-in-circulation has barely budged." I don't see how the following segment - even in it's correct form - sheds any light on this question. But surely this observation is an important clue to unravelling the great inflation/deflation mystery. If the monetary base is expanding, but the money in circulation remains unchanged, obviously the banks are doing something else with this bailout money, right? Doesn't it seem safe to assume that it is being soaked up covering their derivatives bets? to cover some fraction of their losses in credit default swaps? To manipulate the currency and commodities markets? Or perhaps it is all of the above combined with the fact that this expansion of the monetary base is being neutralized by the inherently deflationary effect of massive credit defaults, where money is reduced to the very vapor from which it originated.

    VA:F [1.9.11_1134]
    please wait...
    Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.11_1134]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. Comment by Dan on 10 October 2009:

    Greg: Well Bill is speaking about the US - I don't interpret the article to apply to the planet as a whole. Separate the financial from the real economies, and the US is a flash in the pan, but Bill is showing the path to the answers in this article. Stuart, you are right, and this distinction is important (if you are reading the Daily Reckoning and don't know who actually _runs_ the banks and the Federal Reserve and so on, then google off and find out!)

    The reason I think the article is spot on (for the US), is because this is precisely why the US is down for the knock out. Only I don't forgive the policy makers as being stupid (on point 5), but plain bad. They are just marching to a tune that most people can't hear. Why else are there no daily riots with mobs crying treason?

    VA:F [1.9.11_1134]
    please wait...
    Rating: 4.0/5 (2 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.11_1134]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Post a Response

Comment moderation policy: Port Phillip Publishing supports free speech and frank and open conversation. But we reserve the right to modify or delete your comments if we consider them to be offensive or in violation of any laws, including Australia's anti-discrimination laws

By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our comment policy.


  • Why Should I Sign Up?   We Value Your Privacy
  • Master trader predicts next move for ASX...

    Latest Slipstream Trader Video Market Update Just In... watch for free below.


    One viewer said these prediction videos were “scarily accurate”... another said Murray Dawes was “well on the money”... To find out where the Slipstream Trader thinks the market is headed next, and what that could mean for your investments, click below now to watch his latest video update...

    8th February 2012 - Market Update

    It’s one thing to have a view on where the market is headed next... It’s another to have specific stock trading recommendations emailed to your inbox.

    To take a 90-day, no obligation trial of Slipstream Trader, click here
  • Search

    The Markets

    All Ordinaries4359.400  chart0.000
    S&p/asx 2004285.100  chart0.000
    China Shanghai Co2351.854  chart-0.126
    Gold Sep 110.00  chart0.00
    Clj11.nym0.00  chartN/A
    Nikkei 2258999.18  chart+52.01
    Indu0.00  chartN/A
    S&P 5001352.34  chart+9.70
    Ftse 1005905.70  chart+53.31
    2012-02-13 00:35

    Most Comments

    • Australian House Prices Are Severely and Seriously Unaffordable (312)
    • Majority of Australians Believe House Prices Will Rise in Next Twelve Months (293)
    • Gas is the New Oil (256)
    • A Date for an Aussie House Price Collapse (251)
    • How to Profit From the Path of Progress (230)

    Archives

  • Headline Archive

  • Slipstream Trader

    Thousands now trade the markets who never thought they could...

    Breakthrough in trading techniques helps regular investors:

    • Determine how much to risk in a trade
    • Lock in profits while the position is still open...
    • Exit a losing position before a share tanks...

    If you thought trading was too complicated, prepare to be surprised... click here
  • Australian Wealth Gameplan

    "A rapid contagion is spreading.
    Even if you think you are relatively safe, this is a new, permanent risk. It will be with us for the next decade, or even two”.

    - Edward Morse, Veteran oil trader

    Right now a ‘paradigm shift’ is taking place that could present you with the single biggest investment opportunity of your lifetime.

    It also represents risks to your portfolio that could surpass those of the Global Financial Crisis fallout.

    Get full details in this just-completed presentation. (turn on your speakers)
  • Diggers & Drillers

    “Why a mining executive told me to F*** Off
    in front of a whole room of investors”
    Dr. Alex Cowie doesn’t have the most popular of jobs. At least – not inside the mining industry. For his readers, it’s another matter entirely.

    As Laurence says: “I have never bought a stock and got a 100% return before … thanks for providing the information for me to have that experience – and all within two months too!”

    Right now Alex has unearthed six “must buy” resource stocks for the year ahead. His method for finding them might annoy a few people in the industry… but it could help make a lot of money in 2012 too.

    Find out why, right here

  • Home
  • Newsletters
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Columnists
  • Contact Us
  • RSS

All content is © 2005 - 2011 Port Phillip Publishing Pty Ltd All Rights Reserved

We encourage you to republish our material, all we ask is that you provide a working text link back to the original article on this site.
Port Phillip Publishing Pty Ltd holds an Australian Financial Services License: 323 988. ACN: 117 765 009 ABN: 33 117 765 009
email: dr@dailyreckoning.com.au Tel: 1300 667 481 Fax: (03) 9558 2219
Port Phillip Publishing Attn: The Daily Reckoning PO Box 899 Braeside VIC 3195

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Financial Services Guide

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline