Optus Blocking e-Mail from the Daily Reckoning Australia

Delivered-To: xxxxxx@xxxxxx.com
Received: by 10.110.43.6 with SMTP id q6cs233736tiq;
        Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.252.17 with SMTP id
z17mr1920018anh.35.1219198801406;
        Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path:
Received: from financial2.net ([208.250.48.77])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
i40si1383809wxd.20.2008.08.19.19.20.00;
        Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bounce-1538979-
27813021@financial2.net designates 208.250.48.77 as permitted sender)
client-ip=208.250.48.77;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
bounce-1538979-27813021@financial2.net designates 208.250.48.77 as
permitted sender) smtp.mail=bounce-1538979-27813021@financial2.net
Return-Path:
Received: from [172.16.4.74] ([172.16.4.74:27039] helo=financial2.net)
 by fender (envelope-from )
 (ecelerity 2.2.2.32 r(25176)) with ESMTP
 id 26/B2-29958-7CB7BA84; Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:04:57 -0400
From: "The Daily Reckoning Australia"
To: xxxxxx@xxxxxx.com
Subject: The Weight of Money
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:19:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="MIMEBoundary3fc3ddbdf2624cde4fd5c729204dd551"
X-Lyris-Enable-Scripting-Debug:
Message-Id:
X-Legal: 27813021
x-binding: agorafinancial

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

There Are 7 Responses So Far. »

1. 

   Comment by Banjo Smyth on 20 August 2008:

   Very annoying indeed

   I think it is time that all optus email users joined the 'Gmail' world

   I know i have had trouble in the past with emails not being received because certain words triger spam
   eg. Free

   Best of luck

   hope the problem is resolved - until then Gmail!

   Cheers

   Banjo Smyth
2. 

   Comment by The Daily Reckoning on 20 August 2008:

   Agreed... almost everything gets through to gmail and there are virtually no false positives on the spam filter.

   Nearest we can tell is that Optus is denying all of our email because they think we are sending too much email. We have approximately 4,000 subscribers that are being affected by this problem, I find it hard to believe that we are the only entity in Australia that has over 4,000 Optus subscribers on their newsletter file.
3. 

   Comment by Peter Latham on 20 August 2008:

   Thank you for your email regarding Optus's unwillingness to process your letter.
   I have probably missed your insightful and eagerly sought newsletter more than you have missed me as a subscriber.
   As I have recently gone VOIP for my home phone and no longer use Optus as my phone carrier, Optus increased their internet charges and reduced my access hours.

   What a wonderful system the free market economy is ! My email is rapidly changing to gmail and my ISP is just about to change.

   And then we will all be winners; except Singtel !
4. 

   Comment by Colin on 20 August 2008:

   I have just been speaking to Optus. At first the Indian accented female denied there is any problem. I stood my ground and she eventually advised me Optus knows about the problem and is already on the case. I also pointed out the DR website has information about the Optus problem that shook her she was off to visit the web site after finishing chatting to me.

   Good luck

   Colin
5. 

   Comment by Mark Errey on 20 August 2008:

   Please find a copy of the email I have sent to Optus:

   I would like to know why my subscription to the Daily Reckoning has been blocked by Optus.I would also like to know what right do you have to take the course of blocking my subscription as the site and newsletter are not doing any harm to Optus.This is the sort of thing that goes on in places like China. I doubt I will get any response from you but at least I can go to the Telecommunication Industry Ombudsman and say I tried to get an answer from Optus

   Mark ***** *****@optusnet.com.au
6. 

   Comment by Freak'd on 21 August 2008:

   You need to read "Rich Kids", an enlightening story by Paul Barry about how the boys at the now bankrupt One.Tel got their start in life, followed by bigger pillage and plunder, by first taking the hapless Optus gits to the cleaners. We who partake of Optus custody, oops, er, I mean, custom, helped pay for that. Now we pay again. What a pack of animals; too bad their adds portray the wrong kind.
7. 

   Comment by Marcia G on 22 August 2008:

   Good on you DR for fighting back and informing subscribers of the problem. Optus is a law unto itself. I also am moving over to Gmail. The bigger the institution, the harder it is to get their attention and get change happening. We lowly Optus customers are insignificant to them obviously!

Post a Response