<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private Investors Can Make 230% of Emerging Asia&#8217;s Super-Soar-Away Gains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/private-investors-emerging-asias-super-soar-away-gains/2008/07/07/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/private-investors-emerging-asias-super-soar-away-gains/2008/07/07/</link>
	<description>An independent perspective on the Australian and global investment markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:39:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Coffee Addict</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/private-investors-emerging-asias-super-soar-away-gains/2008/07/07/comment-page-1/#comment-29446</link>
		<dc:creator>Coffee Addict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/?p=2923#comment-29446</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  

The securitised products sold in Australia were reasonably transparent.  The only problem is that very few people understood either the  risk and a lack of proper risk diversification between products.  

All the sellers and buyers knew that default rates over a certain level would trigger losses of interest then capital. Truely they can&#039;t say they didn&#039;t know this and you don&#039;t need to be sophisticated punter to understand what a default rate is either.  They just didn&#039;t believe the risk event could happen in their lifetime. 

An issue for Aussie banks is that their representatives issued protection guarantees to investors in higher ranked products. I wonder if the contingent liabilities are now being brought to account?

To learn more about the Aussie scene see www.imf.com.au</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  </p>
<p>The securitised products sold in Australia were reasonably transparent.  The only problem is that very few people understood either the  risk and a lack of proper risk diversification between products.  </p>
<p>All the sellers and buyers knew that default rates over a certain level would trigger losses of interest then capital. Truely they can't say they didn't know this and you don't need to be sophisticated punter to understand what a default rate is either.  They just didn't believe the risk event could happen in their lifetime. </p>
<p>An issue for Aussie banks is that their representatives issued protection guarantees to investors in higher ranked products. I wonder if the contingent liabilities are now being brought to account?</p>
<p>To learn more about the Aussie scene see <a href="http://www.imf.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.imf.com.au</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.225 seconds -->
