Baby Boomers Shouldn’t Treat Homes as Retirement Investments


“Radioactive Paper” is how Forbes describes it.

Forbes referred to various forms of securitised debt, of which subprime CDOs have probably gotten the most media attention.

You’ll remember how we got to into this mess, dear reader. The whole thing was chronicled in these Daily Reckoning pages. Thanks to a mixture of good luck and bad management, the United States was able to heat up the entire world economy. But now, it’s in hot water itself. Americans are up to their necks in boiling debt while Wall Street has its vaults stuffed with the kind of debt that sets off Geiger counters.

The warnings began earlier in the year. But it was only this summer that the indicators flashed a “Meltdown ” signal. Since then, the papers have been announcing one calamity after another. We’re going to skip the details and go right to the big picture…

The big picture is this:

• The United States has a consumer economy…70% of GDP is consumer spending
• 20% of the entire world’s spending is done by Americans
• Americans counted on house price increases…not only for current spending but for future spending; they expected to retire on them
• Now that house prices aren’t rising…something has to give

Here’s Money Magazine’s Myth #13 about retirement from their recent “Retire Rich” issue:

“Treating your house as the ultimate retirement insurance is an easy trap to fall into. Even with the housing market in the doldrums, the five-year real estate bull market has likely left you feeling house-rich. According to a 2004 study by the National Economic Bureau, upper-income boomers ages 51 to 56 have a third of their net worth invested in their principal residence.

“As recently as May, a survey of affluent boomers by financial adviser Bell Investments Advisors found that nearly 70% were relying on their homes as a retirement asset. Question is, will the strategy work? The answer is, not that well.

“Why? Because it’s hard to eat out on your home equity. You have to live somewhere. To turn your equity into cash, you can sell and then rent, move to a cheaper area or downsize. Most retirees prefer to stay put. Yes, you can do what a small but growing number of retirees are doing: Get a reverse mortgage, which is a loan against the value of your house that you don’t have to pay back. (When you die or move out, the loan is paid off by the sale of the house, which means you may not be able to pass the home on to your children).

“But these loans give you much less than the value of your house. For homeowners aged 62 to 69, lenders will typically let you borrow just 49% of your home equity, says Wharton finance professor Nicholas Souleles.

“The best way to look at your house is as a place to live, not a retirement account. So in the years leading up to retirement, don’t over-invest in it with the idea that you can get that money out later. Keep your mortgage and other housing expenses to no more than 28% of your income, and don’t prepay your mortgage instead of saving for retirement.”

Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning Australia

Bill Bonner

Bill Bonner

Best-selling investment author Bill Bonner is the founder and president of Agora Publishing, one of the world's most successful consumer newsletter companies. Owner of both Fleet Street Publications and MoneyWeek magazine in the UK, he is also author of the free daily e-mail The Daily Reckoning.
Bill Bonner

Latest posts by Bill Bonner (see all)


Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to