<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rio Tinto Sells Gold Investment As Gold Price Nears US$1000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/rio-tinto-gold/2008/02/25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/rio-tinto-gold/2008/02/25/</link>
	<description>An independent perspective on the Australian and global investment markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:28:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Werner Jungling</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/rio-tinto-gold/2008/02/25/comment-page-1/#comment-9688</link>
		<dc:creator>Werner Jungling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 07:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/rio-tinto-gold/2008/02/25/#comment-9688</guid>
		<description>I think it is rather shameless and deceptive for company president and chief executive, Greg Wilkins, to speak as if higher gold prices are good for Barrick Gold, while having 9.5 million ounces of gold on the hedge book which exposes Barrick to nearly unlimited losses as gold prices continue to rise. 

Silver Stock Report
by Jason Hommel, February 25, 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is rather shameless and deceptive for company president and chief executive, Greg Wilkins, to speak as if higher gold prices are good for Barrick Gold, while having 9.5 million ounces of gold on the hedge book which exposes Barrick to nearly unlimited losses as gold prices continue to rise. </p>
<p>Silver Stock Report<br />
by Jason Hommel, February 25, 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/rio-tinto-gold/2008/02/25/comment-page-1/#comment-9653</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/rio-tinto-gold/2008/02/25/#comment-9653</guid>
		<description>&quot;Barrick Gold paid a premium for Rio Tinto’s stake.&quot;

Huh? According to you (&quot;Take a gold price of $940, subtract a production cost of $300/oz and you get $640 per ounce&quot;), Barrick bought 4.6 million ounces of proven + probable. If we say that Barrick can actually mine 75 percent of those reserves, that means Barrick bought $2.2 billion of gold for $1.7 billion. That doesn&#039;t sound bad to me at all.

Barrick is betting that prices will remain here (or go higher) for the next 5 years and Rio is betting that they will go down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Barrick Gold paid a premium for Rio Tinto’s stake."</p>
<p>Huh? According to you ("Take a gold price of $940, subtract a production cost of $300/oz and you get $640 per ounce"), Barrick bought 4.6 million ounces of proven + probable. If we say that Barrick can actually mine 75 percent of those reserves, that means Barrick bought $2.2 billion of gold for $1.7 billion. That doesn't sound bad to me at all.</p>
<p>Barrick is betting that prices will remain here (or go higher) for the next 5 years and Rio is betting that they will go down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.222 seconds -->
