There is a risk in holding cash in an environment of asset price inflation - a condition that usually occurs when governments create large fiscal deficits and inflate the money supply. The practice is endemic to banana republics and declining empires...and it is happening in the US at this very moment.

The global recession and financial crisis have refocused attention on government stimulus packages. These packages typically emphasize spending, predicated on the view that the expenditure 'multipliers' are greater than one - so that gross domestic product expands by more than government spending itself. Stimulus packages typically also feature tax reductions, designed partly to boost consumer demand (by raising disposable income) and partly to stimulate work effort, production and investment (by lowering rates).

The existing empirical evidence on the response of real gross domestic product to added government spending and tax changes is thin... But the evidence is quite strong that these policy responses usually trigger inflation.

I suppose that even someone without any common sense might understand that a "strong currency" over longer periods of time reflects a high degree of prosperity and economic success, whereas a chronically weak currency is symptomatic of economic imbalances, such as a lack of competitiveness or overconsumption, arising usually from excessive supply of money and credit.

I would also suppose that even if someone never travels overseas, he would understand that if the US dollar loses 50% of its value against all the other world currencies (everything else being equal), it means the US is 50% poorer relative to the rest of the world. (Now, this is not entirely correct, since the US has overseas assets that would appreciate in value in USD terms).

Moreover, stock price movements become extremely volatile and erratic in countries with a depreciating currency. In the long run, the depreciation of the currency will usually more than eliminate the gains in local currency terms. So, whereas in 2007 both the Dow Jones and the S&P 500 exceeded their previous highs reached in 2000 in US dollar terms, these indices failed to make new highs in Euro terms. In addition, whereas the US economy expanded in US dollar terms between 2001 and 2007, in Euro terms it actually contracted!

Even with the S&P 500 having shot up since the beginning of the year by over 25%, it has merely kept pace with the price of gold. And during the last 10 years, the S&P has lagged behind the official US inflation rate...while lagging VERY far behind both the euro and gold. Since the end of 1999, the S&P 500 has delivered a total return after inflation of about MINUS 25%.

Unfortunately, the US is not the only country that is busily debasing its currency. "Everyone" is doing it. Because of the current collective debasement of all paper currencies by central bankers, I believe that precious metals and mining companies will maintain their purchasing power.

In the 1980s the US dollar was a very strong paper currency compared to the Mexican Peso. Today, there is no paper currency that is as strong relative to the US dollar as the US dollar was relative to the Peso in the 1980s! The only "currencies" that have a chance of becoming as strong against the US dollar as the US dollar was against the Peso between 1979 and 1988 are precious metals such as gold, silver, platinum, and palladium.

Also, I should add that precious metals could appreciate even if the US dollar miraculously recovered strongly against foreign currencies for an extended period of time. Such dollar strength would probably be a symptom of some horrible economic or political problems around the world, which could be friendly to precious metals.

Central bankers and pundits seem to believe that they have averted the second Great Depression, while ignoring the fact that more and more debt produces less and less GDP and fewer and fewer jobs.

For now, though, the low ten-year bond yield is the lifeline from which all support flows. Much of the investment universe holds together because money can still be had for cheap - not by the volition of a cooperative private sector, rather induced by a US government that simply distributes money for free. Such an ill-conceived idea could only have been born in the test tube of a central banker.

Private lenders comprehend the difficulty of making profits when being forced to lend for nothing, so the government increasingly finds itself to be the interest-free lender of last resort.

Ultimately, if central bankers continue this process for long enough, it is the dollar, and any currency or economy still pegged to it, that could eventually crash. Therefore, we investors find ourselves in the precarious position of having to maintain sufficient liquidity, but not too much in case the real value of these liquid reserves is wiped out by politicians and central bankers gone mad.

Regards,

Dr. Marc Faber
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

• US Dollar As Reserve Currency Not Working Very Well
• 4 Ways to Protect Against a Falling Dollar
• Is Gold Money?
• Gold Falls for Four Straight Days but is the Low Price a Bad Thing?
• Transfer of Wealth

I hopped in and we zipped through traffic. At one point, he crossed over the double-yellow line daring oncoming traffic. "You don't see any taxicab get away with that!" he hollered back at me after blowing through a red light. Just like being in Asia again!

It was a different way to look at Manhattan, with its towering skyscrapers as far as the eye could see. Somehow, it all seemed a lot bigger in a rickshaw. Hard to believe that within six years, New York will no longer be among the world's five largest cities.

The new top five? Tokyo is No. 1, with a population (35 million) greater than all of Canada. Then follows Mumbai, Sao Paulo, Delhi...and Dhaka. Dhaka? Yes, Dhaka. It's the capital of Bangladesh.

There are some big changes afoot in the world's cities. These changes will create enormous opportunities for investors that a previous generation could barely imagine.

Consider some of these notes from National Geographic Traveler:

• In the past 20 years, the world added about 3 million people a week to its urban populations
• More than half of the world's populations live in cities and more two-thirds will by 2030
• The fastest growing cities are all overseas: India has 40 cities with more than a million people; some Chinese cities are growing at more than 10% per year; and Africa's population should double by 2050.

"All cities are cities of the moment," says Richard Wurman, the celebrated American architect says. He is right. No city stays on top for long. In the year 1000, the most populous city in the world was Cordova, Spain. Beijing was tops in 1500 and 1800. London was the biggest in 1900, New York the biggest in 1950. Today, Tokyo.

The pace of urbanization is particularly swift in China and India. More than 25 million people move to cities each year. Some of the numbers are hard to fathom. As US Global Investors points out in a recent presentation, China will add more people in 15 years than the entire population of the United States.

"There will be up to 50,000 new skyscrapers," the company notes, "the equivalent of building 10 New Yorks. There could be up to 170 new mass transit systems. There are only about 70 in Europe today."

This massive population shift has enormous effects on infrastructure spending. Trillions of dollars will have to go toward building power systems, roads, water and wastewater systems, ports and more.

It's like what the US went through in the early 20th century - only on a much more massive scale. Historian Scott Nelson likens the current period to the Long Depression of 1873-96 vintage. Then, a banking crisis toppled Wall Street, too. Unemployment in New York hit 25%. But the Long Depression also paved the way for rising industries such as railroads, oil and steel and spawned a period of innovation and industrial growth.

As Richard Florida comments in The Atlantic:

In 1870... America's population overwhelmingly lived in the countryside. By 1900, the economic geography had been transformed from a patchwork of farm plots and small mercantile towns to a landscape increasingly dominated by giant factory cities like Chicago, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Detroit and Buffalo.

Depressions destroy some things and make others anew. Before the Great Depression, few Americans owned a home. But government policies created the long-term mortgage that led to the rise of the suburbs and homeownership of nearly 70% by 2004. The malaise of the 1970s created the Rust Belt, but also saw explosive growth in the Sun Belt.

Now imagine a transformation very much like America's from 1870-1900, as people moved off farms and into cities. Especially imagine it on a global scale in China and India. Future historians will wonder how we couldn't see this great boom unfolding before our eyes - the boom in the building of cities.

This trend creates awesome opportunities for companies that make the bricks and sticks that create cities. Some of the companies that seem especially well positioned to benefit for the "City boom" are Flowserve Corp. (NYSE: FLS), ABB Ltd. (NYSE: ABB), Northwest Pipe (Nasdaq: NWPX) and Astec Industries (Nasdaq: ASTE).

I am bullish on the cheap stocks of debt-light companies that keep civilization a going concern.

Regards,

Chris Mayer,
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

• The World’s Largest Cities
• Price of Water Rises in China
• If You’re So Rich, Why Aren’t You Smart?
• The Chinese Work Their Way Up the Ladder, As Americans Work Their Way Down
• What Makes the Wheels on a Bus Go “Round and Round”? Electricity!

Our views are different, but not extra-terrestrial. Once upon a time, not so long ago, they were even respectable. The gist of our message two weeks ago was that debt is dangerous. It feels good at first. But give a society too much debt - either in its private sector or the public sphere - and someone's going to get killed. That's why the present situation is such a delight to serious economists; it offers more data points. We get to see how much straw the feds can add before the poor camel's back breaks.

What's the best way to get through a debt crisis? Straight through was our advice last week. For at least a thousand years, the business cycle went round and round without help from central bankers or economists. It is only since these geniuses have been on the case that really serious problems have arisen. The Panic of 1920 - in which the US government did nothing but cut taxes and spending - was quickly forgotten. The Panic of 1929, on the other hand, was followed by massive rigging and jiving by the authorities. It took 20 years and a world war to overcome; today it is still remembered today as the Great Depression.

Martin Wolf, speaking, gravely, for the world's intelligentsia in The Financial Times last week, proclaimed that: "the only thing worse than rescuing the system would have been not rescuing it." But he is wrong; of all the many blessings economists may bestow upon a grateful people, improving the economy is not one of them. An economy is a natural thing. It can be improved by the striving of entrepreneurs, the prudence of bankers, and the sweating of field hands. But when it comes to the macro-economic policy, forbearance is the quality that pays. Any initiative on the feds' part inevitably makes things worse.

The Bubble Era, like the Great Depression, was largely -but not completely - the result of government initiative. Artificially low interest rates - intended to counter the modest downturn of 2001 - sent the wrong message. Consumers - notably those in Britain and America - bought things they couldn't afford. Producers - notably those in Asia - made things for which there was no real market. Debt piled up. Mountains of it.

As consumers bought more and producers made more the economy grew. But much of the economic "growth" of the 2001-2007 period was fraudulent. It was based on debt spending, not on genuine increases in purchasing power. Debt pretends to be real money. It looks like the real thing, but it is not. It stimulates the economy like counterfeit money. It causes production and consumption, but of the wrong sort. Former Reagan era Office of Management and Budget director David Stockman estimates the level of "counterfeit GDP" at $4 trillion in the US alone.

The fraud was discovered, though misunderstood, when sub-prime debt began to implode. The economy had been kissed hard; millions of houses had been built, bought and sold. Now, owners couldn't pay for them. All of sudden, the counterfeit money began to shrivel up. Lenders, investors, and householders all began to de-leverage; paying down the debts as fast as they could, defaulting on those they couldn't.

Rather than come to the obvious conclusion, that they should never have meddled with the economy in the first place, the feds began rescue operations on a breathtaking scale. The British government increased spending to 140% of revenues. America now runs a stimulus program nearly equivalent, in economic impact, to WWII. Not since 1945 have the two pages of its ledgers - debits and credits - told such different stories, with almost $2 of spending for ever $1 in tax receipts. Britain will add almost 50% to its government debt in the next three years. David Stockman expects the publicly held US national debt to almost double in the next five years.

Even at those levels, many economists think the government should do more. Nobel Prize winner, Paul Krugman is one. Richard Koo is another. They've warned that the US (and by extension much of the rest of the world) could suffer a Lost Decade, like Japan, if the government slacks off before consumers have finished de-leveraging. At least they understand what is going on. Too bad they missed the point of it. The problem is too much debt, not too little spending. Leveraging up the public sector doesn't help. Even government debts must be paid - if not by the borrower, then by the lender. The feds are smooching more ardently than any debt lover in history; next, we get to see who dies...or at least who defaults.

Until next time,

Bill Bonner,
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

• Why Weren’t Economists On Top of This Thing?
• Where Do the Feds Get Any Money?
• Keynesians Believe Governments Have to Manage Economy in Macro-Economic Way
• US Economy Still on Runway as Recovery Won’t Fly
• Cash is Created When the Feds “Monetize the Debt” by Buying US Treasury Bonds

"We are sinking in a sea of debt," he admitted. And on the very day when France's president, Nicolas Sarkozy, said he would not raise taxes, Osborne said that he would not lower them. In order to lighten Britain's debt, he'd leave Labor's 50% maximum tax rate right where it is.

Voters don't like hearing about debt. Politicians don't like talking about it. And economists don't want to think about it. And in a kind of collective suicide pact, they have all agreed not to worry about it. But debt is at the center of the world's financial troubles.

Paying off debt is like dying. You try to put it off as long as you can. But nobody runs an open tab forever.

This week brought news that Maine-based luxury yacht maker Hinckley, which has been building boats since 1928, is sinking. The problem is neither technical nor operational. It is philosophical. No one complains about the quality of the boats. Or even the prices (if you have to ask, you can't afford one). The company sailed along nicely until 1997. Then, the private equity hotshots from Boston took the helm. The old Hinckleys who ran the shop looked upon debt as though they were looking at a bottle of whiskey. A drink now and then did no harm. But watch out. Too much will sink you. In the 70 years they ran the place, they accumulated only $1 million of debt. But the new owners were dipsomaniacs; they multiplied Hinckley's debt 20 to 40 times. (Exact figures are not available.)

For much of history, failing to repay debt was regarded as not merely a breach of contract, but a crime. People who failed to repay their debts in timely fashion were thought to have stolen from their lenders; they were put in prison. In the Middle Ages even a dead debtor's children could be sent to prison.

Now, bankruptcy laws allow individuals and businesses to go to rehab. Then, they can stiff creditors again. Neither sin nor crime, debt is now just a cost of doing business.

But few creditors are as forgiving - or perhaps as forgetful - as those who lend to governments. That is the conclusion of a new book by Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, This Time It's Different. The two professors document the history of eight centuries of "financial folly." What we learn from it is what we already knew - that borrowers are often perfidious, crises are usually insidious, and bankers are morons.

Just five years ago, Ben Bernanke looked out on the calm seas of the Bubble Era. "The Great Moderation," he called it. Bernanke took the credit. It was due to "improved macro-economic policies," he said. In retrospect, he probably should have said it was just luck and left it at that. His macro-economic policies made things worse, encouraging all sectors of the economy to borrow. We know what this did to Hinckley. Riding low in the water, with too much debt heaped on its deck, the yacht maker struggles to stay afloat.

But what's new, ask Reinhart and Rogoff? Always and everywhere, debt leads to trouble. Too much debt caused France to default on its sovereign debt eight times. Spain defaulted six times before 1800 and then another seven times later.

Latin America, as the authors point out, would have been safer for bankers if the printing press had never made its way across the Atlantic. Between hyperinflation, defaults and banking debacles - over two centuries - the banana republics scammed banks out of billions. In the '80s, Nicholas Brady tried to rescue New York bankers with his US- backed "Brady bonds." Readers of these back page columns can guess what happened next. Within a few years, seven of the 17 countries that had undertaken a Brady-type restructuring had as much or more debt than they had before. By 2003, four members of the Brady bunch had once again defaulted and by 2008 Ecuador had defaulted twice.

Even non-existent countries go broke. In 1822, "General Sir" Gregor MacGregor issued bonds from a fictitious country he called Poyais, whose capital city, Saint Joseph, was described by the offering prospectus as having "broad boulevards, colonnaded buildings and a splendid domed cathedral." The bonds sold at lower yields than those of Chile. But it didn't matter whether the country was real or imagined, all of them defaulted.

As for the present slump, the authors offer no predictions, but some guidelines. In the run-of-the-mill crisis, real housing prices generally go down 36% over a six-year period. GDP, in real terms, per capita typically goes down 9.3% while unemployment rates go up for five years, with a 'normal' increase of about 7 percentage points. But the closest parallel to the present circumstance, which they call 'the Great Contraction,' is the Great Depression of the 1930s - which was much worse. Unemployment in Germany and Denmark rose over 30%. Building activity fell 82% in the United States. Chile saw a 90% collapse in its exports.

Tax revenues fall in an economic slump. Government expenses increase (especially when the authorities are ready to do 'whatever it takes' to stir a recovery). Typically, say Reinhart and Rogoff, public debt increases 86% over a three-year period following a financial calamity. Then come more catastrophes, caused by too much debt in the public sector. Both Britain and America are now running deficits of more than 10% of GDP. Neither has a creditable plan for reducing debt or deficits. So stay tuned. Much more trouble lies ahead.

Until next time,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

• Fed Will “Monetize the Debt”
• We Expect No Recovery from the Economy
• U.S. Treasury Auctioning Off $81 Billion in New Debt
• US Dollar is Getting Trashed
• Cash is Created When the Feds “Monetize the Debt” by Buying US Treasury Bonds

Another pile of hay had another message: "Farmers On Strike."

The story behind these signs has a depression-era, black and white, look to it. Newsreels from the Great Depression show US farmers dumping milk rather than sell it at deflated prices. Now, French farmers do the same. Prices have fallen so low that many refuse to sell it at all.

But they can't stop milking the cows. So what do they do with the milk? They give it away. Or, in a few instances, they throw it at the government's farm agency offices.

Meanwhile, a story in The New York Times explains one of the reasons why milk has become so cheap. New technology makes it easier and cheaper to produce good milk cows.

Technology and globalization are inherently deflationary. The former increases productivity, thus lowering the cost of output. The latter lowers prices by directing business to the world's lowest-cost producers.

Deflation is the natural order of things. Inflation is always an artifice caused by government. Central banks 'target' a certain level of inflation because they think - or say they think - that a bit of inflation helps create full employment. And it does, sometimes. But it does it by treachery. Inflation hoodwinks the working class. It reduces their real wages, making them cheaper to employ. Then, the proles wise up. They realize that prices are rising. They demand more wage increases. That is when inflation begins to get out of control and presidents get out the 'Whip Inflation Now' buttons.

Every time government offers to solve a problem, it inevitably makes the problem worse - except, occasionally, in rare episodes when a government-organized national defense pays off.

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

• Australian Dairy Prices Up Due to Grain Prices
• Cattle Prices Have Risen Only 1% This Year
• Feds’ Plan is to Reflate the Economy
• China Fueling Inflation in Australia & New Zealand
• An Abundance of Paper Money is Causing Food Prices to Soar

Here at The Daily Reckoning, this is not the first time we've paid homage to these lesser deities. Nor is it the first time we've mentioned their perverse method: Those whom these gods wouldst destroy are first cursed with good luck. Today, we look at the bright side: later, they are blessed by misfortune.

According to a pair of researchers from the University of Michigan, a depression does more for longevity than diet or exercise. Life expectancy during the worst years of the Great Depression increased from 57.1 years in 1929 to 63.3 years in 1933, says the report by Jose A. Tapia Granados and Ana Diez Roux. It didn't matter whether you were a man or a woman, black or white. And it didn't matter if you were in the US during the Great Depression or in Spain, Japan or Sweden during their economic downturns. The results were the same.

By contrast, life expectancy declined during the boom years. For most age groups, "mortality tended to peak during years of strong economic expansion (such as 1923, 1926, 1929 and 1936-1937)," they wrote in the "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences."

Conventional wisdom holds that recessions are times of stress. People do not eat as well. They skip medical check-ups. They should drop dead earlier. Instead, they live longer. Perhaps it is because the economy slows down, allowing people to live at a more comfortable pace. Maybe the unemployed get more sleep. We don't know. But if you want to live an extra six years, nothing works like a slump. When it comes to economic health too, nothing beats a depression.

Last week, World Bank president, Robert B. Zoelick, explained to Washington how the dollar made Americans wealthy:

"The United States is incredibly fortunate that the dollar enjoys this special status [as the world's reserve currency.]" It made it possible for Americans could buy things abroad with dollars and then, rather than come back to the United States as a claim against US assets, the dollars stayed in foreign central bank vaults. It was as if the Untied States, and the United States alone, could issue IOUs and never have to pay up. An "exorbitant privilege," Valery Giscard d'Estaing called it.

Since the end of WWII, the world had no real alternative. It had to use the dollar in its international transactions, just as it once used gold. This had a marvelous effect on world trade and roughly the same effect on America as a winning lottery ticket. And like a lottery winner, she was ruined by it.

With no effective limit on the number of IOUs they could issue, Americans issued far too many. From a low of around 2% of disposable income in 1945, US debt service rose to nearly 15% in 2007. In terms of total debt/GDP, the ratio was only about 150% in 1945, but that was with public debt from the war years at 120% of GDP. By 1950, the war debt had been cut down to about 70% of GDP, with private debt still at about 35%. At the height of the bubble years - 2005 to 2007 - total debt in America hit 360% of GDP, only 60% of it owed by the federal government.

Of course, most economists saw nothing to worry about. Instead, they set to work proving that such a 'dynamic' and 'flexible' economy would never fail.

They even won Nobel Prizes for elegant formulae that showed investors how to beat the market, year in and year out.

Then, the bottom fell out of asset prices in '07-'09. In March of this year, Americans found that their stocks had fallen back to real values not seen since 1968. Their houses were sinking fast too. By May 2009, one out of every four US homeowners was 'underwater' - with a mortgage greater than the value of his house. Incomes and profits were falling, along with the net worth of the typical American household. Everything was falling - except debt. How the gods must have roared when they saw the looks on their faces! In the biggest, longest boom of all time - even with a monopoly on the world's reserve currency - Americans had lost ground.

But while Americans were once damned by good fortune, they are now blessed by bad luck. "Looking forward, there will increasingly be other options to the dollar," says Mr. Zoelick. Thank the rascal gods. Americans are saving again...rebuilding their balance sheets...and, eventually, their economies. They can even look forward to living longer. And with a little more bad luck, maybe their moron economists will wise up too.

Until next time,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

• Contradiction in the Balance of Economic Forces
• The Greatness of a Depression is Commensurate to the Government’s Efforts to Prevent It
• Good Luck with Money
• RIP Robert S. McNamara and California’s Holes in its Budget
• The Solution to a Depression is a Depression

"The future will be a total disaster, with a collapse of our capitalistic system as we know it today, wars, massive government debt defaults and the impoverishment of large segments of Western society," he writes.

"We have a money-printer at the Fed," he continues, "which guarantees runaway inflation, wholesale debasement of the dollar, and a major lowering of living standards for most Americans and many Europeans as well.

"Meanwhile, Paul Volcker says that China's rise merely 'highlights the relative decline of the US.'"

So there you have it: China on the way up, America on the way down.

That's the drama that we're watching every day, here at The Daily Reckoning. In our view, the peak of US wealth and power probably came during the period between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the fall of Lehman Bros. But there are probably a lot more shoes to drop before people are fully aware of what is going on.

The way we see it, almost the entire 20th century was a mistake...a dead end.

Europeans were clearly on top of the world when the century began. Then, after WWI the Europeans in America took the lead role. But WWI shook their faith in their evolving political order. Not long after, the German hyperinflation and the Great Depression shook their faith in their economic and financial order. This left a huge vacuum, which was soon filled by ruthless adventurers and ideological schemers. Much of the rest of the century...from '39 to '89...was spent in hot wars and cold wars against these Bolsheviks, Fascists, Stalinists and Maoists.

In the end, the more reasonable and consensual societies of the West won the battle. But they, too, were transformed by 50 years of war and nearly a century of bad ideas.

"Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. When you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you," Nietzsche warned.

Looking into the abyss created by Mussolini, Hitler, Tojo, Pol Pot, and the rest, Western societies decided both to fight them...and to join them. Tax rates soared. Regulations multiplied. University professors taught socialism, Freudianism, modernism, cubism, feminism, racism...and every other 'ism' they could think of. Parents spent good money to spend their children to universities that turned them into mush-heads.

And - perhaps most ominous - in the United States of America, the military grew into a greedy, grasping goliath...the very thing Eisenhower had warned against.

Then, there were counter-trends in the '80s...led by Margaret Thatcher in England and Ronald Reagan in the United States. But these were mostly frauds. Top marginal tax rates were rolled back. And there were some cuts in regulatory procedures. But government spending tended to go up anyway. Worse, Ronald Reagan mistook the Soviet Union for a genuine threat and increased military spending even further to combat it.

And now, the United States staggers under the weight of its eternal wars...its imperial illusions...and its everlasting efforts to provide bread and circuses. If it kept its books like a private enterprise, it would be broke. If it were a public corporation, it would be de-listed.

Still, it spends and spends...and there is no stopping the spending. Trillions are spent on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, for no apparent reason. But who complains? Too much money is at stake. There are too many lobbyists for too many industries and too many special interests involved. Military spending - even in a time when America faces no substantial challengers - cannot be rolled back. Neither can social spending.

Marc Faber is right. There too, there are too many people with too many dogs in this fight. Both military and social spending will continue to expand until the empire is ruined.

Until tomorrow,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

• The Anniversary of the “Esperanto Money”
• How Will the United States Finance the Biggest Deficit of All Time?
• The Codependent Relationship Between China and the United States
• America’s Service Industry is responsible for Low Wages
• US Dollar Declining as China’s Currency Rises

The $2.5 billion listing of Myer is expected this week. And what better way to celebrate a six-month reality-defying rally than the listing of a consumer-driven business? Happy days are here again!

Not that we have anything against Myer. It's a good store. We recently bought a sweater there to get us through Melbourne's Antarctic spring. But you know our position here at the Daily Reckoning.

You don't wash out twenty years of mis-allocated credit with a mild recession and then return to the glory days of the stock market. We are still in the middle of a large deflation in credit-backed financial assets. The Myer listing may give the index a boost. But it's not going to change the big picture.

The big picture is that across the Western world consumers are dialing back the spending and turning up the caution. A sea change in attitudes about the future is taking place. For example, the U.S. Commerce Department reported that durable goods orders fell in August by 2.4%. Take away government subsidies for new cars and households are not buying big ticket items.

And then there's housing. Existing home sales fell by 2.4%, the first decline in five months. Here's a warning: watch out for a second massive wave of foreclosures in U.S. housing. U.S. banks, thanks to a relaxation of mark to market accounting rules, have been able to put off the day of reckoning on what to do with millions of non-performing loans. That day, though, is coming.

There are other looming issues like commercial real estate. But we know you must be tired of hearing all that. After all, that is America, not Australia. It would be much easier if we quoted the impossibly smug Kevin Rudd that the government has saved the day. But that just ain't the case.

By our reckoning, the second dip of the global downturn is upon us. Government policy (monetary and fiscal) has merely lured people into believing there is no real cost for decades of bad investments. But the truth is that a lot of stock analysts and economists have simply miscalculated the magnitude and severity of what happens to the real economy when the world's largest ever credit bubble bursts.

Of course we could be wrong. Nobody knows what's going to happen. You hedge your bets and continue to plan for the future. But we're about to find out if we've been living through a modern version of 1930, when a false recovery in the economy was the prelude to the "Great" part of the "Great Depression."

Maybe this will sound like a bunch of whining by the end of the week. After all, three of the big four Aussie banks will report results this week. There will be billion dollar cash profit figures tossed around. But as we said last week, the earnings performance of financial firms in the last six months is a sham.

Cost cutting, government loan guarantees, and an infusion of central bank credit allowed all the big financial players to trade their way to profits for a few quarters. What we don't expect to see is that the Australian banks are suddenly keen to expand their loan books or that their underlying businesses are fundamentally better now than they were twelve months ago. A simple question: just where will the profits come from now?

In the meantime, keep an eye on oil. Sometimes the oil price is driven by speculators. Sometimes it's driven by expectations for the economy. And sometimes it's driven by flat out geopolitical fear. We think now could be one of those times were geopolitics drives crude. Why?

We got a note from a commodities trader in Chicago over the weekend. Up at three a.m. as we're getting over our jet leg we read, "In the big geopolitical dance that has dominated recent headlines there remains one player that all the action seems to swirl around. That player is Iran.

"President Obama's announcement of the discovery of a second 'secret' uranium processing facility with shouting distance of the Shiite holy city of Qum has raised the stakes in what is quickly becoming a very dangerous game. If you read between the lines, nearly all of the geopolitical maneuvering over the past few months has been about the same thing.

"Obama dumps Bush's land-based missile system for a sea-based one that poses far less threat to Russia. Russia - without admitting it, of course - then becomes more accommodating to sanctions against Iran. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu goes to Russia without telling anybody and gets caught doing it. Why?

"Certainly not to talk about the weather. We believe Netanyahu was there for a specific purpose: to warn Russia what would happen if Iran did not stop producing bomb-grade uranium. We also believe Obama's controversial move was designed to give Russia political cover to pressure Iran to do just that. Now that a second uranium-producing facility has been found, the stakes have risen again.

"If some sort of political solution to the Iran crisis is not found within the next few months, Israel will strike - with or without the 'permission' of the United States and the price of oil will react accordingly. The global slowdown is currently focusing all the attention on demand, but the biggest bullish factor out there is ultimately, supply. Remove Iranian oil from the market and the old highs of $147 per barrel could be tested quickly.

"Is this going to happen? We hope not. However, our read of the geopolitical events of the past few months makes us think it could be a distinct possibility.

Dan Denning
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

• Iran Suffering from Own Version of Peak Oil
• Latin America Has Suddenly Become Very Interesting
• Are Farm Prices Destined to Rise as More People Compete for Food?
• No Spike in Oil Price Following IEA “Third Oil Shock” Announcement
• Price of Oil May Rise Due to Scale of Georgian Conflict

"The damage caused by high taxation during the Great Depression is the real lesson we should learn. A government simply cannot tax a country into prosperity. If there were one warning I'd give to all who will listen, it is that U.S. federal and state tax policies are on an economic crash trajectory today just as they were in the 1930s.

"The Smoot-Hawley tariff of June 1930 was the catalyst that got the whole process going. It was the largest single increase in taxes on trade during peacetime and precipitated massive retaliation by foreign governments on U.S. products...beginning in 1932 the lowest personal income tax rate was raised to 4% from less than one-half of 1% while the highest rate was raised to 63% from 25%. (That's not a misprint!)... By the end of January 1934 the price of gold, most of which had been confiscated by the government, was raised to $35 per ounce. In other words, in less than one year the government confiscated as much gold as it could at $20.67 an ounce and then devalued the dollar in terms of gold by almost 60%. That's one helluva tax....

"Inflation can and did occur during a depression, and that inflation was strictly a monetary phenomenon..."

"The 1933-34 devaluation of the dollar caused the money supply to grow by over 60% from April 1933 to March 1937, and over that same period the monetary base grew by over 35% and adjusted reserves grew by about 100%. Monetary policy was about as easy as it could get. The consumer price index from early 1933 through mid-1937 rose by about 15% in spite of double-digit unemployment. And that's the story."

We had no doubt that inflation can occur during a depression; hey, we read the papers. Anyone who has followed the Zimbabwe story knows that you can have a deadly depression...and dizzying levels of inflation at the same time.

But there's always more to the story. Devaluing the dollar in terms of gold had the immediate effect of increasing the money supply - it was like adding zeros to the currency.

In our wallet is a ten trillion dollar Zimbabwean bill, with a picture of stones on it. Those words - 'ten trillion' - did not get printed on that bill by accident. We assume they got printed on their by a printer in the employ of a government that figured that the cost of printing a ten trillion dollar bill was less than the cost of not printing it.

That is, by a desperate government that had so fouled-up the economy that a period of hyperinflation might seem like an improvement. Besides, hyperinflation might have a therapeutic, purgative effect.

But let us not get sidetracked by hyperinflation. It is nowhere in sight. Nor is its more civilized cousin - normal, polite inflation. The money supply in America - as measured by M2 - is contracting. The banks get money from the feds, but they don't pass it along. The chain of reflation is broken - or at least temporarily stretched. Currently, it takes a long time for money to get from one end to the other. The cash tends to get waylaid -either by the bankers...or by consumers themselves. It stays in bank vaults...or in bank accounts. Money is not being multiplied by the speed by which it changes hands. Instead, it is divided by immobility. It sits. It shrinks. It waits for a real boom.

Until tomorrow,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

• Oil and Gold Prices Linked for Most of Recession Period
• Climate Change and Hyperinflation Reader Mail
• Brazil is a Good Place to Become Rich
• Ben Bernanke Pays Homage to Milton Friedman’s Theory
• Policy Makers and the Depression

"Since the global financial system started unraveling in dramatic fashion two years ago, distinguished economists have suffered a crisis of their own," starts the article. "Ivy League professors who had trumpeted the dawn of a new era of stability have scrambled to explain how, exactly, the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression had ambushed their entire profession.

"Amid the hand-wringing and the self-flagellation, a few more cerebral commentators started to speak about the arrival of a 'Minsky moment,' and a growing number of insiders began to warn of a coming 'Minsky meltdown.'

"'Minsky' was shorthand for Hyman Minsky, a hitherto obscure macroeconomist who died over a decade ago. Many economists had never heard of him when the crisis struck, and he remains a shadowy figure in the profession. But lately he has begun emerging as perhaps the most prescient big-picture thinker about what, exactly, we are going through.

"A contrarian amid the conformity of postwar America, an expert in the then-unfashionable subfields of finance and crisis, Minsky was one economist who saw what was coming. He predicted, decades ago, almost exactly the kind of meltdown that recently hammered the global economy."

Economists went off their heads in the last few decades. They thought capitalism would make us all rich. And they thought capitalism automatically tended toward beneficent equilibrium.

Here at The Daily Reckoning, intuitively, we guessed the contrary. The system produces a kind of orderly chaos...in which the rich are frequently impoverished, the proud are humbled...and the goofballs who think capitalism fails inevitably make things worse.

Until next time,

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning Australia

• Nobody Appreciates Laissez-Faire Capitalism
• Depression: A Natural and Recurring Feature of Capitalism
• Gold Price Should Continue Going Up as the Dollar Accelerates its Terminal Decline
• Nobama rally… Nobama bounce… Nobama bull market… Nobama nuthin’…
• Capitalism and Capitalists