<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Daily Reckoning Australia &#187; oil demand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/tag/oil-demand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au</link>
	<description>An independent perspective on the Australian and global investment markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Has Oil Hit Its Peak Price?</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/oil-price-8/2008/05/22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/oil-price-8/2008/05/22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 03:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mayer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil and gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil or gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/?p=2723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has oil hit its peak price or not? The answer to that question leads us to ask whether or not commodities are a bubble about to burst. Barron’s recent cover story on commodities came down on the side that the party was over. I don’t put a lot of faith in macro predictions – as no one can predict the future. But you can study track records. You can look at history. History reveals some interesting clues about what the future may hold.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has oil hit its peak price or not? The answer to that question leads us to ask whether or not commodities are a bubble about to burst. Barron’s recent cover story on commodities came down on the side that the party was over.</p>
<p>I don’t put a lot of faith in macro predictions – as no one can predict the future. But you can study track records. You can look at history. History reveals some interesting clues about what the future may hold.</p>
<p>The quick take? It doesn’t look like the party is over just yet. But even if it is, past peaks in oil give us clues. When you dig a little deeper into those relationships, you find a great road map for making money.</p>
<p>If you look at the price of oil, you find something interesting. Since January 2001, you can explain the move in the price of oil largely as a function of increasing money supply. As the amount of money grows, the price of oil rises. In fact, almost 87% of the move in the price of oil can be explained by the increase in money supply, as this next chart shows:</p>
<p>Basically, $100 per barrel oil is what we would expect to see, given this relationship between the oil price and money supply. Given that we are still in the midst of a credit crisis of sorts, it seems unlikely the Fed will tighten money in any way at all. That leaves a clear path for the price of oil and commodities to continue to rally in nominal terms.</p>
<p><span id="more-2723"></span></p>
<p>The other thing to remember – and people forget this by worrying excessively about a U.S. recession – is that the story of oil is no longer a U.S.-centric story. You’ve surely heard about how the rapid growth in China and other emerging markets drives oil demand. Well, it’s good to keep that in mind.</p>
<p>China and India are only beginning to consume oil at any meaningful level. Right now, they are consuming oil at a rate the U.S. did in the early years of the 20th century. But look, we don’t need China to start guzzling oil like we do. Even if it moves half the distance between it and Hong Kong, that’s a lot of extra demand. The way I look at it is this: What’s more likely, China stays at 1910 oil usage or moves somewhere closer to, say, 1950s U.S. oil usage? I think the latter.</p>
<p>Mark Mobius, in a column he wrote for the Financial Times , points out that the fundamentals in emerging markets are better than they’ve been in a long time. The future looks bright. “The Chinese and Indian consumers are the world’s new consumers and they, along with consumers in Brazil, Russia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Mexico, Poland and many other emerging markets, are becoming an important force in global markets.”</p>
<p>All that bodes well for oil demand. But I haven’t really gotten to the best parts yet...</p>
<p>Even if oil has already peaked, that doesn’t mean oil is headed back to $40 per barrel or lower. In fact, if this oil boom follows history at all, we’re looking at years of oil prices right around $100 per barrel.</p>
<p>It is important to realize that in no prior oil boom did the price of oil retreat rapidly toward where it was before the boom began. In each case, the price of oil stayed up for years after the peak. That ought to give you some comfort about our current situation. The price of oil should stay up here for years. If his estimate of 2013 is at all close, we’ve got plenty of time left to make a lot of money.</p>
<p>So where do you go to make that money?</p>
<p>The one obvious place people will automatically look to is to own oil and gas producers. That’s not a bad idea at all. But I’ve got another angle here. The next two charts are amazing. They show you the capital and exploration spending of both Exxon and Chevron from 1928-2007. They show spending bottoms in 1948 and 1974. After each bottom, there was a long run of spending. Spending peaked nine years after 1948. Spending peaked seven years after 1974. If 2005 proves to be the bottom on capital spending – and it seems so, since Exxon only recently announced it would increase its capital spending to $25-30 billion over the next few years, a 25% increase -we won’t see capital spending peak until 2012 at the earliest.</p>
<p>Now, why is this important? Think about what the oil companies spend money on. Where do they go shopping? They go shopping at the oil field services and equipment companies.</p>
<p>So that is where we want to be. Because even if oil has peaked, we’re still looking at years of strong spending by the oil companies. You want to have some exposure to the receiving end of all that spending. Such companies will mint cash. And they give you a little different payoff than owning a straight producer. It can sometimes be better to own the picks and shovels. You don’t actually own or produce the oil or gas, but your equipment is vital to those that do.</p>
<p>Newmont Mining, the big gold producer, is an example of a producer that has profoundly disappointed investors amid what may be the greatest gold bull market in history. Newmont’s costs rose so fast and so much that it never really enjoyed (at least not so far) the higher price in gold. But if you were in some mining equipment manufacturer, you got paid.</p>
<p>So the key takeaways here are these: The price of oil has room to run yet, in part because of the growth in money supply and in part because of pressing international demand. Secondly, even if we already saw oil peak, history says that prices won’t retreat by much over the next several years. And finally, the capital spending boom by the big oil companies is just getting started, which is great news for investors in oil field services companies.</p>
<p>The big idea here is well servicing...</p>
<p>It’s really a great and kind of sneaky way to play an undeniable trend in oil and gas: the depletion of older wells past their peak production. Well servicing helps you get a little extra out of every well. A well service rig is the workhorse that does the well servicing.</p>
<p>Here’s the life cycle of a typical oil well...</p>
<p>Every time somebody drills a well, it creates an annuity for the well service industry. That’s because the maintenance work follows the life span of a typical well. If you don’t service your well, your production rate declines much more rapidly. So if you want to stay in business, you keep servicing your existing wells. You may not drill new ones, but you keep what you have.</p>
<p>The second key to remember is this: The more mature the oil or gas field, the more well servicing work needed. Well servicing doesn’t typically have the same ups and downs as exploration. Well service fleets provide much more durable and predictable cash flows. I expect all that money the big majors spend on exploration will lead to a lot of new drills and a long tail of new business for well servicing companies.</p>
<p>Chris Mayer<br />
for The Daily Reckoning Australia</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/peak-oil-supply-data-doesnt-lie/2009/08/27/" rel="bookmark" title="Thursday August 27, 2009">Peak Oil: Supply Data Doesn&#8217;t Lie</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/oil-has-hit-a-new-record/2008/04/17/" rel="bookmark" title="Thursday April 17, 2008">Oil Has Hit a New Record High</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/supply-of-conventional-crude-oil-is-very-close-to-its-peak/2009/10/27/" rel="bookmark" title="Tuesday October 27, 2009">Supply of Conventional Crude Oil is Very Close to its Peak</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/peak-oil-the-rewards/2009/10/29/" rel="bookmark" title="Thursday October 29, 2009">Peak Oil &#8211; The Rewards</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/pemex/2008/04/11/" rel="bookmark" title="Friday April 11, 2008">Pemex and Mexican Peak Oil Equal Expensive Oil</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 54.290 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/oil-price-8/2008/05/22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oil Prices Has The Mogambo Guru Sticking His Thumb in His Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/oil-prices-2/2008/05/20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/oil-prices-2/2008/05/20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 03:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mogambo Guru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/?p=2698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when I thought I had completely lost my sense of humor, I ran across a MoneyNews.com article titled “Lehman Bros. Report: Oil Bust in the Cards”. Hahahaha! Thanks, Lehman!! Hahaha! I needed the laugh! Perhaps part of the humor is that this comes at the same time as the price of gasoline went up 3 cents to another record high of an average of $3.70 a gallon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when I thought I had completely lost my sense of humor, I ran across a MoneyNews.com article titled “Lehman Bros. Report: Oil Bust in the Cards”. Hahahaha! Thanks, Lehman!! Hahaha! I needed the laugh!</p>
<p>Perhaps part of the humor is that this comes at the same time as the price of gasoline went up 3 cents to another record high of an average of $3.70 a gallon. This is up 22% from this time last year! 22 percent! 22! Hahahaha!</p>
<p>It gets even funnier when Lehman is not just predicting lower prices, but “Lehman is now predicting prices at $83 a barrel in 2009 and as low as $70 in 2010.” At this point I am laughing so hard that my stomach hurts, and since I am on the verge of pooping in my pants, I am desperately trying to stop laughing by sticking my own thumb in my eye, but it does no good! I just keep going, “Hahahaha! Oww! Hahahaha! Oww!”</p>
<p>But $70 a barrel of oil? Hahahaha! Oww! Hell, the cost of production is higher than that! So does Lehman think that production costs are going to go down? Hahahaha! Oww!</p>
<p>Bill Bonner here at The Daily Reckoning , taking no notice of my anguish or my thumb, says, “Ten years ago, China imported 165 million barrels of oil per year. Today, the total is more than 1 billion. Wonder why the price of oil hit a new high last week – above $126 a barrel? Well, China is a big part of the answer.” A whopping 600% increase in ten years, and yet Lehman thinks that oil will go down in price? Hahahaha! Oww!</p>
<p><span id="more-2698"></span></p>
<p>Kevin Kerr at Whiskey and Gunpowder says, “According to the most recent data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, oil demand for countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development – which includes developed nations like Japan, Germany and the United States – has gone up 14% since 1980. Oil demand for the rest of the world, however, has skyrocketed 43%. That’s more than three times as fast!”</p>
<p>And yet Lehman thinks that the price of oil will go down? Hahahaha! Owww!</p>
<p>So, handily summing up, you can take it from me, the Loudmouth Mogambo Prognosticator (LMP), the guy with the ready laugh and the sore eye where somebody keeps sticking his thumb in it, when I tell you that there is no way, absolutely no way, absolutely no freaking way in hell that oil will be that low next week, next month, next year or ever! Hahahaha! Oww!</p>
<p>I was going to go to the medicine cabinet to find something that would stop my eye from mysteriously hurting, when it fell on Sean Brodrick at MoneyandMarkets.com writing, “According to the International Energy Agency, China’s overall oil demand rose by 7.8% in February from a year earlier, much higher than earlier estimates of a 5.3% gain. And gasoline demand rose by 22.8%!”</p>
<p>Careful Mogambo Scholars will take particular note of the use of Mr. Brodrick’s use of exclamation points in highlighting the rise in gasoline demand, as this means to me a rise in the use of internal combustion engines, meaning that a lot of work is being done, which means that a lot of raw materials are being consumed.</p>
<p>In fact, he reports, “As a result of that surge in demand, China’s crude oil imports rose 15% in the first quarter and 25% in March. Its imports are rapidly accelerating!” Again one notes the use of the exclamation point!</p>
<p>And in another very populous country, India, he says that “oil product sales – a proxy of demand – surged by 10.9% in February compared to a year earlier.” Yow! Eleven percent in one year!</p>
<p>The interesting part, which is a euphemism for, “the price of oil is going to go through the freaking roof one of these days real soon, and for a long time after that, too, and if you want to make a lot of money, then get your worthless butt in gear and go out and buy things connected with oil” because all of this gigantic surge in demand is coming at a time when supply is shrinking.</p>
<p>This is made manifest when Mr. Brodrick reports that “oil production is already shrinking in 60 of the world’s 98 oil producing countries. So it’s no surprise that in March, global oil supply fell by 100,000 barrels per day, led by lower supplies last month from OPEC, the North Sea and non-OPEC Africa.”</p>
<p>And Kevin Kerr agrees, too. “Unfortunately” he writes, “there’s no way for supply to keep up.” As in “no way, absolutely no way, absolutely no freaking way in hell, just as The Mogambo put it in a previous paragraph”, which he could have said but didn’t.</p>
<p>This is important stuff, so I call up the local paper and tell them that I want one of their stupid little reporters to come over for my news conference so that I can tell the world what is happening. The little receptionist asks, “Is this The Mogambo?” and I proudly say, “Yes, it is!” Then, suddenly, the line goes dead! So I call back, and the same little receptionist asks, “Is this The Mogambo?” and I proudly say “no!”</p>
<p>Then she says, “Is this about inflation?”, and I say, yes, it will impact inflation, and before I can say another word, she says, “It’s you, you Stinking Mogambo Idiot (SMI)!”, and hangs up again!</p>
<p>So, if you never read in your newspaper how inflation is going to kill all of us, especially inflation in the price of energy, then blame the stupid little receptionist.</p>
<p>The inflation you can blame on the corrupt Federal Reserve, and the corrupt Congress (except Ron Paul), which encouraged them, and the corrupt Supreme Court, which let them continually ignore the part of the Constitution that requires that money be only of silver and gold.</p>
<p>The Mogambo Guru<br />
for The Daily Reckoning Australia </p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/chinese-laughter-the-sound-of-us-stupidity/2009/06/16/" rel="bookmark" title="Tuesday June 16, 2009">Chinese Laughter the Sound of US Stupidity</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/higher-oil-prices-the-new-normal/2009/11/05/" rel="bookmark" title="Thursday November 5, 2009">Higher Oil Prices, the New Normal</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/iea-rejects-possibility-crude-oil-output-decline/2010/01/22/" rel="bookmark" title="Friday January 22, 2010">International Energy Agency Rejects Possibility Crude Oil Output is in Terminal Decline</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/price-inflation-food-price/2008/05/06/" rel="bookmark" title="Tuesday May 6, 2008">What&#8217;s Driving The Mogambo Crazy This Week: Price Inflation, Food Prices, Etc</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/bullish-on-silver/2009/10/06/" rel="bookmark" title="Tuesday October 6, 2009">Bullish On Silver</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 52.682 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/oil-prices-2/2008/05/20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
