Ben Bernanke the money bomber has resorted to delivering his anti-gold, pro-fiat sermons to captive audiences on US college campuses. He is returning to his roots as a professor.
But professors must profess. So what is Dr Bernanke professing? Obviously he's repeating the claptrap that to simulate growth you need to lower interest rates. But according to the rather nauseating article (which isn't much more than an appeal to authority) Bernanke is going after Herbert Hoover's Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon.
Mellon was asked by Herbert Hoover how to deal with the Great Depression. According to Hoover's memoirs, Mellon replied:
Liquidate labour, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate. It will purge the rottenness out of the system. High costs of living and high living will come down. People will work harder, live a more moral life. Values will be adjusted, and enterprising people will pick up the wrecks from less competent people.
Now there is some doubt as to whether Mellon actually said this. The only source is Hoover, who was trying to make himself look compassionate and enlightened by comparison. But if Mellon didn't say it, he should have. This is a common sense view, which is probably why so many people oppose it. Time does not make bad investments go good. The recession/correction/liquidation is the cure for the disease of inflation.
Mellon, if he actually said those words, certainly didn't mean liquidation in the sense that say, Stalin, would have meant it. He wasn't suggesting Hoover go out and shoot the farmers the same way Stalin liquidated the Kulaks who opposed his collectivist agrarian policies. But Bernanke reportedly called Mellon's prescription, "pretty heartless".
Isn't that big of him?
The "liquidation" of bad investments is another way of saying that there comes a time when you must give up on the belief that an investment will come good. The sooner you do this, the better it will be for everyone. Resources like capital and labour will no longer be tied up in unproductive investments. But more importantly, human lives will no longer be engaged in activity that doesn't make anyone more productive, wealthier, or happier.
Bernanke is the heartless one in all of this, even if he thinks his heart is in the right place. He represents an idea that has destroyed the life savings and purchasing power of millions of people. The control of money by central banks has sucked even more people into investment and borrowing decisions that will take them years to recover from, if they ever do.
It's not only heartless to believe in fiat money. It's brainless. Maybe that's why the centralisation of the money supply by people who have infinite confidence in the technology of the printing press receives so much popular support. People who support it aren't really thinking. They're believing...and following orders. "Nothing to see here....move along."
This brings us, finally, to the point we didn't make yesterday because it didn't occur to us! Is Hitler's belief in the impregnability of his encryption machines at all similar to the belief high-frequency traders have in their machines? Here's a letter we got with the idea:
Loved your piece this morning about Hitler's paranoia and the misplace trust in machines. Could it be that the Money Power is doing the same relying on ultra fast algorithms to do their bidding, as they now don't trust the human aspect to judging a stock's value....
Or is that just me being paranoid!
Keep up the fascinating comment and reasoning, I look forward to the DR every morning!
Now that is pretty interesting. We've written before that the growth of high-frequency trading and algorithm-based trading is itself based on a faulty idea: that everything that happens in the world affects the price of every security, every second and requires the constant, computerised repricing of securities...and this is tradeable.
That seems absurd to us. If anything, the growing domination of the trading bots has divorced securities prices from underlying value. The pricing mechanism of the market itself starts to break down when it becomes self-referential...automated trading strategies adjust to each other without any human intervention or human judgement. It's not a market anymore. It's just a computer talk fest.
There is certainly a bad idea somewhere in all of this, or a misplaced belief in the power of machines to improve markets. If anything, machine-based trading is leading to more instability and volatility within the financial system. It's not leading to better price discovery. It's leading to price irrelevance.
The automation of trading coupled with the compulsory inflow of your cash into the market is another way in which the modern investment game is rigged. It makes it very hard to win. Not playing is an alternative. Or buying tangible assets and precious metals, even if Ben Bernanke doesn't like (or understand) them. We're not trying to make money from gold. We're trying to avoid losing purchasing power on the value of our labour.
for The Daily Reckoning Australia
From the Archives...
Gold Money: A Once-in-a-Generation Buying Opportunity
2012-03-23 - Greg Canavan
A Question Australia Might Have to Answer
2012-03-22 - Joel Bowman
Australian Tax: Running Government at a Profit
2012-03-21 - Nick Hubble
China: Why All Feasts Must Come to An End
2012-03-20 - Satyajit Das
Greg Smith - A Former Goldman Sachs Insider Finally Speaks Out
2012-03-19 - Eric Fry
- AIG to Receive $85 Billion Loan from Fed
- Ghost of the Great Depression
- Daily Reckoning Plan to Save the World
- The Bush Administration Has Been the Most Liberal Administration Since Franklin Roosevelt
- How the Feds Fight a Great Correction and Prolong Economic Depressions
About the Author
Dan Denning is the author of 2005's best-selling The Bull Hunter (John Wiley & Sons). He began his financial publishing career in 1997 and has covered financial markets form Baltimore, Paris, London and, beginning in 2005 Melbourne. He’s the editor of The Daily Reckoning Australia and the Publisher of Port Phillip Publishing.