The New Monetary Accord No One’s Talking About

Chinese Yuan

The currency wars started in 2010 with the weak Chinese yuan. Barely a week went by without Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner complaining about Chinese currency manipulation and the weak yuan.

By 2011, China was doing better and the US was stuck in a rut of low growth coming out of the 2008–2009 recession. This necessitated a weak dollar to give the US economy a lift in the form of higher exports, more jobs in the export sector, and more inflation due to higher import prices.

That’s the basic currency wars formula — lower export prices to create jobs and higher import prices to get inflation.

Currency wars involve devaluation of your currency as a form of monetary ease. Devaluation is what you do when you can’t get growth any other way.

The problem is that not everyone can devalue against everyone else at the same time. It’s a mathematical impossibility. So you have to take turns.

It was China’s turn in 2010 and the US’s turn in 2011. The dollar hit an all-time low in August 2011.

Right on cue, real US GDP grew 4.6% in the fourth quarter of 2011 — the highest quarterly growth rate since the end of the recession in 2009.

This was good news for the US, but another one of the five families was suffering — Japan.

Japan needed help desperately, and set out to get it by continuing the currency wars. In December 2012, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced an economic program to revive Japanese growth.

This was called ‘Abenomics’, and it had three ‘arrows’. They were monetary policy, structural reform and fiscal policy. Monetary policy was explicitly intended to cause a weak yen.

This worked. The yen rapidly fell from 90 to 124 to the dollar. This gave the Japanese economy a lift in 2013, just as the cheap dollar gave the US a lift in 2011.

While China, the US and Japan had taken turns with a cheap currency from 2010–2013, Europe was suffering with a strong euro. This was the period of the recurring Greek sovereign debt crises. Europe also had two recessions along the way. By 2014, it was time for the cheap euro.

This was accomplished in two stages. In June 2014, Mario Draghi and the ECB moved to negative interest rates. Then in January 2015, Draghi introduced ‘euro QE’ which was an expanded form of money printing.

The euro promptly fell to an interim low of US$1.05 in January 2015, and has fallen close to that level several times since.

As was the case with the other devaluations, the European economy got some relief. We stopped hearing about the Greek crisis after the summer of 2015.

This history shows that the currency wars from 2010–2015 proceeded in an orderly way. Each one of the five families got some economic benefit (China in 2010, the US in 2011, Japan in 2013 and Europe in 2015).

Although the currency wars were ongoing, they were being managed successfully by the five families. This is how the Mafia operates when there’s peace; everyone gets along with everyone else, even with an undertone of mutual distrust.

But in the summer of 2015, a new war broke out among the five families. China went rogue and tried to cheapen its currency without consulting the others in advance. On 11 August 2015, China launched a shock 3% devaluation of the yuan in one day.

We all know what happened next. US stock markets plunged. By late August, stock investors were staring into an abyss.

The Federal Reserve immediately backed off its plan to hike rates (so-called ‘lift-off’) in September. The rate hike was put on hold, and a relief rally in US stocks began.

The same thing happened from December 2015 to January 2016. This time, the Fed went ahead with the lift-off by hiking US interest rates 0.25% on 16 December, 2015.

China used the Fed’s rate hike as air cover to cheapen the yuan again. This time, they did it not on a shock basis but on a stealth basis. China moved the yuan lower in small steps day after day. Markets were not fooled. Market participants could see yuan was going down and immediately discounted further devaluation.

Source: Bloomberg

[click to open in new window]

Once again, US stock markets crashed in response to a Chinese devaluation. From 1 January 2016 to 11 February 2016, US stocks had their worst start to any year in history, entering full-blown technical correction territory — close to a technical bear market.

The Fed rode to the rescue again. Officials such as New York Fed President William Dudley gave a series of dovish speeches, and the Fed took a March interest rate hike off the table.

Once again, US stocks began a relief rally. From mid-February to mid-April, the damage of the January meltdown was undone and stocks recovered, thanks to the Fed.

But the game was getting dangerous. How many times could the Fed bail out the stock market? How long would the Chinese play with fire by devaluing the yuan?

In fact, China needed a cheaper yuan. The Chinese economy is the second largest in the world. It’s coming in for a hard landing. Years of wasted investment, asset bubbles, debt accumulation and corruption were coming home to roost.

The Chinese yuan had been getting stronger since 2011 as the US, Japan and Europe took turns cheapening their currencies.

It was China’s turn for a weak yuan. Enter the Secret ‘Shanghai Accord’…

This was the state of play as the heads of the five families gathered in Shanghai, China, on 26 February of this year. Technically, this was a G-20 meeting of finance ministers and central bank officials.

But formal G-20 and IMF meetings are used to conduct informal private meetings on the sidelines. The G-20 meeting in Shanghai was the perfect cover for a ‘sit-down’ of the five families, led by the boss of bosses — Christine Lagarde.

The US, China, Japan, Europe and IMF all agreed that China needed some relief. The world’s second-largest economy cannot go down without taking most of the world with it.

For that matter, the US was weakening also. Real GDP growth in the fourth quarter of 2015 was an anaemic 1.4%.

The estimate for the first quarter of 2016 from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta is 0.3%, close to recession levels. Not only are both quarters extremely weak, but the trend is downward.

The US looks like it is heading into a recession. Even if a technical recession is avoided, this weak growth in the world’s largest economy has ripple effects that will drag down the global economy.

With China and the US both weakening, it was time for another change in the currency wars.

The problem was how to weaken the Chinese currency without crashing global stock markets. Lagarde did not want a repeat of what had happened in August 2015 and January 2016.

The purpose of the sit-down in Shanghai was to come up with a plan to give China relief without causing a global panic.

The ‘GDPNow’ real-time forecast from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta shows US growth in the first quarter of 2016 at 0.3%, very close to recession levels.

Traders were obsessively focused on the yuan/US dollar cross rate (the ticker symbol for this is CNY/USD). If CNY/USD could somehow be left undisturbed, markets might not notice immediately what was being done.

The solution was to take action in the US, Europe and Japan while China did nothing.

This was the heart of the Shanghai Accord.

Europe and Japan would both tighten policy and strengthen their currencies. The US would ease policy and weaken the dollar. China would maintain their dollar peg so CNY/USD would be unchanged.

A stronger euro and yen is the same thing as a weaker yuan, from China’s perspective. China has a larger combined trading relationship with Europe and Japan than it does with the US.

Relief for China from a strong euro and strong yen is significant. At the same time, a weaker dollar means a weaker yuan if the peg is maintained. China is just ‘along for the ride’ as the Fed trashed the dollar.

That’s the essence of the Shanghai Accord. China does nothing but gets a major devaluation in the currency wars, and no one notices because CNY/USD is steady.



Jim Rickards
Strategist, Strategic Intelligence

Ed note: The above article was originally published in Money Morning. You can read more of Jim Rickards’ insights into central bank and government moves in the currency wars, in his premium publication, Jim Rickards Strategic Intelligence. Jim writes regularly to Australian readers about how you can protect your investments and even profit from macro moves around the world. To find out more, click here.

Jim Rickards
James G. Rickards is the editor of Strategic Intelligence, the newest newsletter from Port Phillip Publishing. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 35 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Currency Wars and The Death of Money. Jim also serves as Chief Economist for West Shore Group.

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of

Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to