Unsound Money in China

Reddit

The Aussie market is bouncing – rather mildly – off multi week lows today. Funnily enough, it’s been all down hill for the ASX200 since Ben Bernanke announced part two of the Fed’s large-scale money printing program in early November. Since that announcement, the index has fallen around 4.4%.

So a bit of a rally is in order. But I don’t think it will be anything to get too excited about. Over the past two-and-a-half months the ASX200 has range traded between 4,600 and 4,700 (except for a brief Bernanke induced pop to 4,800 in early November).

There’s nothing to suggest this trend, or rather lack of one, will change anytime soon. Central banks have created massive amounts of liquidity and this is keeping asset markets afloat despite the dubious underlying fundamentals.

But sooner or later trading ranges break to the upside or the downside. With the RBA maintaining its tightening bias, and credit growth in Australia remaining very weak, it’s hard to see how a move higher could be sustained in the short term.

That’s the bad news. The good news is that you won’t be subjected to that inane cliché, the ‘Santa Claus Rally’. Gerry Harvey certainly doesn’t see one materialising.

What about the arguments for a downside move? Well, the eurozone is an obvious example. At best the authorities will be able to contain the situation for another few months. But it looks like the markets are beginning to realise the peripheral countries are effectively insolvent, and that debt restructuring, not more debt, is the answer to their problems.

Closer to home though, China is looming as a major threat to Australia’s ongoing prosperity. The consensus view in this country is that China is going through a decades long boom and we’ll continue to ride on their coat tails for years to come.

I think that is a dangerously complacent viewpoint.

Look, anyone with a minor understanding of history and economic development can see that the 21st century belongs to China. Just in the same way that the 20th century belonged to the US.

But it wasn’t smooth sailing for the US and it wont be for China either.

One of the biggest myths about China is that its huge FX reserves (around US$2.65 trillion at last count) are a sign of strength. They are not. The reserves are a product of a mercantilist policy that is now starting to backfire.

More to the point, these FX reserves are a product of unsound monetary policy from both the US and China. The US, as owner of the world’s reserve currency, prints money at will. It avoids discipline because countries like China buy up these dollars to maintain export competitiveness.

Ben Bernanke, of all people, highlighted the unsound nature of the global financial system in a speech last week in Frankfurt. In a moment of extraordinary hypocrisy, he pointed out the financial system was no longer working property.

It’s actually been working pretty much the same way for decades, but the US is no longer benefitting from it as they once were. The system has allowed the US to spend way beyond its means since 1971. Now, the spending spree is over and they want to change the system.

China is not so keen. Which brings me back to why China’s mercantilist policy of building FX reserves is a long-term weakness, not a strength.

Here’s how it works. China’s reserve accumulation is a product of it buying US dollars in order to keep the yuan from appreciating. It buys US dollars with newly created yuan, which end up as reserves in the Chinese banking system.

The US’ ultra loose monetary policy over the past few years has seen China step up its efforts to stop the yuan from appreciating. The result has been an explosion in the money supply, credit growth, and now, predictably, inflation.

Inflation in China is a big concern for the communists. As Keynes said, ‘there is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency’. Currency debauchment = inflation.

US monetary policy is fuelling inflation in China (probably deliberately so) but with all-up unemployment of nearly 17% in the States, they don’t care. Bernanke said as much his Frankfurt speech last week.

The US is becoming more aggressive towards China because it knows it’s in a position of power.

China may have a massive ‘war-chest’ of US treasuries but it’s hardly a weapon or a threat to the US. The hoard is too big to sell. And if they did it would force a contraction in domestic credit. Not exactly what you want when trying to contain a massive property bubble.

So China is stuck with the prospect of destabilising inflation unless something is done to reign it in, and quickly.

They have two choices, none of which are good.

One, let the yuan appreciate. This would be good for households (as it would improve their purchasing power) but bad for the all important export sector. Many of China’s manufacturers operate on very thin margins. A stronger yuan would wipe out this thin profit layer.

Two. Raise interest rates. This is the likely scenario but also probably the most dangerous. Raise rates too slowly or not enough and inflation continues to build. Increase rates too fast and its property bubble will collapse.

Either way, China has little option but to take liquidity out of the market. The implications for Australia are huge. It means our terms of trade have probably peaked, that interest rates won’t go as high as expected, and that unemployment could rise more than forecast.

If you have faith in central planning and think the Chinese bureaucrats are smart enough to engineer a goldilocks slowdown, then you have nothing to worry about. This seems to be the consensus view.

But if you think that central planning is a ‘fatal conceit’, which history has proven to be the case time and again, then you should be very worried indeed.

By the way, the next instalment in my ‘Sound Investing’ series is out today. So if you want to sign up to receive this free report, click here.

To give you some context, I am the editor of a report called Sound Money. Sound Investments. It’s part macro stuff, like you have just read, and part stock recommendations.

My view is that the world’s monetary system is undergoing fundamental change and will move towards a ‘sound money’ footing in the years ahead. Understanding how this evolution will impact equity markets is crucial for you to preserve and build your wealth. It will lead to increased volatility. I believe that by following ‘sound investing’ principles, you will greatly enhance your chances of growing your wealth in what will be a very challenging decade.

If this sort of thinking appeals to you, sign up for your free report today.

Greg Canavan
Greg Canavan is the Managing Editor of The Daily Reckoning and is the foremost authority for retail investors on value investing in Australia. He is a former head of Australasian Research for an Australian asset-management group and has been a regular guest on CNBC, Sky Business’s The Perrett Report and Lateline Business. Greg is also the editor of Crisis & Opportunity, an investment publication designed to help investors profit from companies and stocks that are undervalued on the market. To follow Greg's financial world view more closely you can subscribe to The Daily Reckoning for free here. If you’re already a Daily Reckoning subscriber, then we recommend you also join him on Google+. It's where he shares investment research, commentary and ideas that he can't always fit into his regular Daily Reckoning emails. For more on Greg go here.
Reddit

Leave a Reply

5 Comments on "Unsound Money in China"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Jay
Guest

In regards to what the Bernank said “he pointed out the financial system was no longer working property”? or properly? either way the sentence will make sense :)

Barry
Guest
re your comments about the 21st century belonging to China. That may be true for a decade or two but the elephant in the room threatening that scenario is the Middle Kingdom’s ruthless one child policy. Decades of abortion and forced steralisation are already having their effect, with some commentators predicting China may be the first nation in history to become old before it reaches its potential. Already, because of the Chinese preference for boys the country has more than 20 million surplus males beteween the ages of 15 to 30+. Demographic imbalance, micromanaged by a communist government and an… Read more »
Biker
Guest

What it predicts, Baz, is mass-migration to the south, for wahines.

As a mate of mine once proposed, it will draw you further than dynamite will blow ya…

Ned S
Guest

You occasionally read stuff that says China wants to improve old age pensions and health care. I’m just not sure they’ll especially try to take on such expenses if the population doesn’t already have entrenched expectations re same?

Wahines – Wonder what the Warriors will think of that suggestion? :)

pom
Guest

“…the prospect of destabilising inflation unless something is done to reign it in” ILLITERATE

“…the prospect of destabilising inflation unless something is done to rein it in” CORRECT

wpDiscuz
Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to letters@dailyreckoning.com.au