Why Australia’s Economy Is So Structurally Unsound

Australia
Reddit

It’s time to check in on our Aussie bellwether stock, the Commonwealth Bank [ASX:CBA]. As I’ve said a few times in the past, the CBA is a great representation of the Aussie economy.

Yes, it’s a well run company and all that other clichéd stuff. But let’s not pretend it’s making its own way. The CBA is a beneficiary of the secular decline in interest rates over the past few decades and Australia’s deformed economic structure that has resulted from this rate decline.

Add in the one-off windfall from the China boom (now fast declining), which Aussies leveraged up to speculate on property, and you can see why the CBA has had a pretty good run over the past decade. Let’s have a look at its share price performance…



Source: BigCharts

Click to enlarge

As you can see, CBA is still in a strong long term uptrend. The global credit crisis and its after-affects took some time to shake off. The correction during 2010 and 2011 occurred because the RBA increased interest rates during that time.

But when the rate cutting cycle kicked in in late 2011, CBA’s share price took off. Moreover, the rate cutting cycle kicked off a wave of speculation in the residential property market.

The effects on CBA were two fold. Firstly, lower interest rates reduced the attractiveness of cash and then fixed interest and increased the demand for dividend paying stocks like the CBA.

CBA traded on a dividend yield of around 7% before the rate cuts kicked in. Now, the yield is around 4.9%. This ‘yield compression’ represents capital appreciation of around 40%.

Now throw in low interest rate induced borrowing to engage in property speculation, which is a highly profitable business for CBA, and you get profit growth and dividend increases as well as this yield compression.

Lending against residential property is very profitable for the banks because they only have to set aside a small amount of capital for each loan written. For every $100 lent out, the big banks only have to ‘back’ that loan with a few dollars of equity capital.

That’s partly because of lax prudential lending rules around residential property (it’s considered nearly risk-free) and partly because the big banks get to make their own rules on how much capital they should set aside.

The result is they set aside as little as possible. That is why the CBA has a world beating return on equity of around 18%. The bank is very profitable. And the bank is very profitable because the amount of equity it holds is tiny company to the company’s assets. That is, it’s highly leveraged.

The point here is that everything has combined over the past few years to provide a healthy tailwind for CBA. As well as the monetary policy tailwind, the government has pitched in to lend a helping hand.

One of the main reasons why Australia’s economy is so structurally unsound is that the tax system encourages property speculation at the expense of productivity enhancing investment.

One of the most egregious examples of this is the policy of negative gearing. The original intention was to encourage investment to expand the housing stock. But all it did was encourage speculation in existing housing. The policy has been a total failure.

Even the RBA recognises this, although it’s about a decade too late. From the Financial Review:

The growing push to abolish or scale back negative gearing received a big boost when the Reserve Bank of Australia called on the government to review whether a capital gains tax break for investment property is driving too much money into housing.

In a surprising intervention in the debate over housing affordability, the Reserve Bank effectively questioned two Howard-era decisions that it argues have increased incentives for Australians to ramp up riskier housing investment at the expense of first-time buyers.

While the Reserve Bank acknowledges that negative gearing can help keep rents down, it says how it works with other tax rules may have the effect of encouraging leveraged investment in property”.’

The RBA is all of a sudden concerned about negative gearing because it realises monetary policy is doing little to help the real economy. It mainly benefits property speculators.

The bank clearly wants to lower rates again but doesn’t want to risk future financial stability by blowing the housing bubble even higher. So now it’s weighing in on tax policy.

It’s all too late of course. And the government has no intention of ending the negative gearing gravy train. Most politicians are in on the rort and they know the electorate has no appetite for structural reform, that is, changing the tax system to change the structure of the economy.

As well as the RBA, the banking regulator, APRA, is coming to the party when everyone is already legless. As the Australian reports:

The banking regulator has tightened the rules governing the major banks’ property lending, ordering them to provide monthly growth reports for investor loans and flagging a range of restrictions if lenders failed to fall into line.

Revealing further insights into its crackdown on riskier lending, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority pointed to a suite of “macroprudential” tools it could use to contain risks, such as some lenders failing to properly assess borrowers’ ability to repay under higher interest rates.

‘Tools it could use’? Wow, that’s strong stuff. To continue the party metaphor, APRA has rocked up to the scene with a bottle of mineral water. Clearly, they’re a laughing stock and command little respect from the hard core party element.

Don’t take my word for it though. The market is saying the same thing. Check out the CBA share price again. It’s trading around $87, which is not too far from its all-time highs.

The recent share price bounce suggests investors aren’t duly concerned about regulatory risk. But they are eyeing another interest rate cut and drooling at all the benefits that it will bring.

On the other hand, the bear in me says that CBA’s share price could be topping out. China’s slowing economy and the iron ore price crash are slowly working their way through to the heart of the Aussie economy — the banks.

More interest rate cuts could forestall any effect on profits for another year or two. So the burden of proof is on the bears. Keep one eye on the $80 level for CBA. If the share price turns back down and breaks through it, it will be a win for the bears.

From there, a further fall below the October 2014 low of around $74 would be much more ominous.

But that’s a long way away. For now, the bulls are in control. This tells you Australia’s structurally deformed, low interest rate and asset price dependent economy is holding up on the fumes of easy money.

As I said, if you want to know when this fragile structure will finally give way, keep an eye on CBA. It will provide warning ahead of time.

Regards,

Greg Canavan+,
For The Daily Reckoning, Australia

Join The Daily Reckoning on Google+

Greg Canavan
Greg Canavan is the Managing Editor of The Daily Reckoning and is the foremost authority for retail investors on value investing in Australia. He is a former head of Australasian Research for an Australian asset-management group and has been a regular guest on CNBC, Sky Business’s The Perrett Report and Lateline Business. Greg is also the editor of Crisis & Opportunity, an investment publication designed to help investors profit from companies and stocks that are undervalued on the market. To follow Greg's financial world view more closely you can subscribe to The Daily Reckoning for free here. If you’re already a Daily Reckoning subscriber, then we recommend you also join him on Google+. It's where he shares investment research, commentary and ideas that he can't always fit into his regular Daily Reckoning emails. For more on Greg go here.
Reddit

Leave a Reply

2 Comments on "Why Australia’s Economy Is So Structurally Unsound"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
John Hutchinson
Guest
Hi Greg The latest push is to increase the GST by 50% !!!! These financially deficient dimwits have blown the Mining Boom, failed to increase consumer spending through Interest Rate cuts, forced Renters into a life of servitude to the Landlord, whilst never seeing one benefit from reduced Interest Rates and now believe the best way to get out of a whole is to increase a consumption Tax which should effectively reduce consumption further !!!. Meanwhile a senior politician sees nothing in spending $5,000.00 on a 100km commute between soirees or a Million Dollars trying to win a seat at… Read more »
Mik Fax
Guest

Revolution John? we couldn’t be further from it. You would have to take away the ipods and ipads and any ball that could be used for sport, and close all the beaches, then you might keep peoples attention for longer than 6 seconds. Surely we will all go along with some high inflation, sacrifice our standard of living to maintain asset prices, it is the only way cowards survive. And none of our polys would be brave enough to face deflation.

wpDiscuz
Letters will be edited for clarity, punctuation, spelling and length. Abusive or off-topic comments will not be posted. We will not post all comments.
If you would prefer to email the editor, you can do so by sending an email to letters@dailyreckoning.com.au