Janet Yellen made headlines last week. She promised the Federal Reserve would be ‘patient’ in raising interest rates.
Investors must not have known what she meant.
With the Dow tearing more than 421 points — or 2.4% — higher, half of investors must have thought she meant higher rates later than expected.
The other half must have thought she meant higher rates sooner than expected. Treasury bond prices fell. And the yield on the 10-year T-note completed its biggest two-day move higher in 17 months.
Investors give Ms Yellen far too much credence either way.
Will she raise rates sooner…or later?
She probably doesn’t know. She is just reading the newspapers as we do, and wondering when she can get away with it.
She looks in the mirror in the morning and gasps…incredulous of the way people overestimate her. She knows — at least before putting on her makeup — that the whole thing is nothing but face paint and false accounting.
Yellen just doesn’t want to be the Fed chief who has to admit it. And she certainly doesn’t want to be remembered as the one who finally popped the biggest credit bubble in history and ushered in a global depression.
More fun than North Korea
Meanwhile, US foreign policy is finally lightening up…
After half a century, it was clearly time for the Land of the Free to let go of its abiding dislike of the Castro brothers.
In the light of history, they don’t look so bad. After all, plenty of movies have been made featuring Castro-like characters; never once did they threaten to blow up US movie theatres.
Besides, Cuba will be more fun to visit than North Korea.
Imagine a country almost untouched by modern conveniences and the progress of the last 50 years.
No shopping malls, billboards, freeways, speed traps, Howard Stern, blue states, red states, terror alerts, student debt, Obamacare or QE.
Sounds pretty good, doesn’t it?
And imagine a country where you can lose 100 pounds in five years at public expense. This is sure to be a big hit with Americans when it opens to the public.
Too much debt
But today, we continue with our look at the macro situation at the end of 2014…
One way of measuring GDP is to add together consumption, investment, government spending and net exports.
The idea is to measure total spending. And in this way, also measure production.
Most things produced are sold. Add up how much spending there is and you get an idea of how much production there’s been.
US GDP is reported to be $18 trillion a year — with $3.5 trillion coming from US federal government spending. Add state and local government spending, and the total rises to more than $6 trillion.
This means that the private sector — the part that pays the bills — is only $12 trillion.
Total debt — government, corporate and personal — in the US is now $58 trillion (misreported yesterday as $59 trillion…but what’s a trillion dollars between friends?). That’s nearly five times the real economy that supports it.
And it helps explain why it is so hard to ‘grow your way out’ of debt.
Assuming an annual interest rate of 2%, even if you could contain debt increases to 3% of GDP a year, the productive part of the economy would have to grow at 5% just to stay even.
No developed economy in the world is growing that fast.
At an interest rate of 3%, the annual interest on $58 trillion is $1.7 trillion. That’s slightly less than 10% of GDP. But it’s 14% — or one of every seven dollars — of the private sector economy.
And as recently as January 2002, the 10-year Treasury note yielded over 5%.
If the average interest rate were to rise to that level again – and sooner or later it will — it would take $3 trillion to service America’s debt — or one-quarter of private sector output.
That can’t happen. The wings would fall off first.
There would be a bear market in stocks and a depression in the economy — wiping out trillions of dollars of unaffordable debt and unworkable investments.
Bigger burdens, weaker backs
That is how nature deals with debt bubbles. But it’s exactly what the Fed wants to avoid.
By trying to make the economy grow faster, so that debt — as a percentage of output — is less of a burden.
But let’s see, how does this work?
To grow your way out of debt you have to increase income faster than debt. Say you can sustain a healthy rate of GDP growth of 3% a year. That means that additional debt mustn’t exceed 3%.
For 2014, the US fiscal deficit — the gap between what the federal government receives in taxes and what it spends — was 2.8%. It is unlikely to go much lower.
That is just the amount borrowed by the feds. The private sector is still two-thirds of the US economy. If it borrowed nothing, debt might contract, relative to the underlying economy.
But without borrowing, the economy will shrink. That is why the feds stepped up to the plate in 2009 and started swinging. The private sector had stopped borrowing.
The theory behind Keynesian countercyclical policy is that government can offset the lack of private sector demand for credit by borrowing far more than usual.
Over the last five years, the federal government’s countercyclical stimulus program added $9 trillion to the nation’s debt. During that time, the private sector scarcely grew at all.
Debt can only increase output if it is used to build new productive capacity. If you spend it on Medicaid and wars, it is gone forever.
The private sector ends up with a heavier burden… and a weaker back to carry it.
Even when the private sector borrows, it is often merely to boost consumer spending. What’s more, the Fed’s ultra-low lending rates often lure capital into unstable and dangerous investments — such as shale oil or subprime auto loans.
So, much of the credit going to the private sector is also wasted.
Since the 1970s, private sector growth rates have gone down. Shackled to trillions in debt…duct taped with regulations and restrictions…deceived by phony financial signals from central banks…they will probably remain low and sink lower for the foreseeable future.
Grow your way out of debt? Not likely.
for The Daily Reckoning Australia