The Fed is Panicking
Over the past couple of weeks, while your regular weekend editor has been away, I have been introducing you to some of the other writers in the Agora global network.
This week, I want you to meet Nomi Prins.
I had the pleasure of meeting Nomi back in 2016 when we attended a conference in Berlin together.
And to be blunt, I’ve never met anyone with a deeper understanding of how the big banks operate than her.
Of course, it makes sense why she understands institutional banking so well.
She’s held senior roles at Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, and, many years ago, was an analyst for Chase Manhattan Bank.
To put it a better way, Nomi is Wall Street banks.
Nowadays, Nomi writes for The Daily Reckoning in the US, and has authored a book on the US banks as well.
Today she joins us, with a deep dive into what the Fed is thinking.
Her take? Corporate debt is up, US dollar-denominated debts could be a bigger problem than first thought…and the risk level is high once more.
In short, the world’s most powerful central bank is panicking.
I’ll leave Nomi to explain it.
Until next time,
The Fed is Panicking
Nomi Prins, Contributor
I was recently in Washington, DC for high-level meetings focused on the US economy.
While meeting with senior officials and members of the House and Senate, it became clear that a troubling phenomenon is building.
In the wake of December stock market volatility and uncertainty surrounding monetary policy, it seems that political figures are starting to grow concerned.
There is growing consensus that the makings of a financial crisis of some sort is building — and could drop sooner rather than later.
While there is speculation over whether it will be as big as the last one, and whether it will come in waves, the belief is that something is wrong.
The Fed know how bad it is
With those fears, I turned to the Federal Reserve itself.
While meeting at the Fed, I was given the impression that bank regulators have been routinely chastised by Wall Street bankers.
What I learned is that some of the biggest playmakers in finance don’t want to disclose the true nature of their positions and moneymaking schemes.
This confirmed my own experiences as a former investment banker.
In addition, it became clearer that Fed Chairman Jay Powell and Vice Chairman Randal Quarles will be closely studying real economic and bank data when rendering decisions about the path of interest rates.
Many have speculated about such dealings, and whether they will be swayed by President Trump’s pressure.
The truth is that the leaders at the Fed have a firmer understanding of what’s really going on in the economy than they allude to publicly.
Even though the Fed has been able to avoid another financial crisis the last decade, with quantitative easing (QE) policy — or what I call dark money — its ‘toolkit’ might not render us ‘safe enough’.
The reliance on dark money
You see, the Fed manufactures dark money that the markets have come to rely on.
Through QE, the central bank has accumulated a balance sheet that hit a high of US$4.5 trillion of assets last year.
By having purchased these assets with electronically created money, the Fed was able to keep rates at the middle and longer end of the yield curve low, while it specifically set low rates for the short end of the yield curve, too.
Just to remind you, the yield curve is the difference between short- and long-term interest rates.
Long-term rates are normally higher than short-term rates. When the two converge, it often means markets are anticipating low growth ahead.
When the yield curve inverts, when long-term rates fall below short-term rates, it’s almost always a sign of looming recession, historically speaking.
Currently the Fed’s book of assets has been reduced by only a bit — to about US$4.1 trillion — but it’s still historically large.
If the Fed continues to sell those assets (which consist of US Treasury and mortgage bonds), there is a risk that their value will drop too much, too quickly. If bond values drop, then rates will rise in the middle and longer end of the yield curve.
This would make it more expensive for most companies to repay, or extend, their corporate debts.
The Fed knows it is currently in a catch-22.
Trouble with corporate debt
Here’s something else you might not know: Back in December, it even quietly increased its book of assets.
That’s the opposite of the policy of unwinding, or selling its assets through quantitative tightening (QT), which is what Chairman Powell promised he would be doing.
That’s another sign that the Fed is afraid of a possible new financial crisis.
For more proof, consider that former Fed chair Janet Yellen just did a 180-degree turn on her prior comments related to the possibility of another crisis.
Last June, she said that she didn’t think there would be another financial crisis in her lifetime, attributing this to banking reforms made since the 2008 financial crisis.
Now, everything has changed.
At the start of the year, Yellen told The New York Times that, ‘Corporate indebtedness is now quite high and I think it’s a danger that if there’s something else that causes a downturn, that high levels of corporate leverage could prolong the downturn and lead to lots of bankruptcies in the non-financial corporate sector.’
She noted that CLOs could be a real problem, as I’ve been warning for months. CLOs, or collateralised loan obligations, are a Wall Street product stuffed with corporate loans.
If that sounds familiar to you, there’s a reason.
Wall Street is doing exactly what it did with mortgage loans before the 2008 financial crisis, but with corporate ones.
More leveraged than ever before
Yellen’s timing was not random.
Just because she’s no longer running the Fed doesn’t mean she has no contact with its new leader, who was her number two.
The people and connections within central banks and Wall Street are always in play.
The danger in her analysis is that she’s largely mistaken that ‘current holders of corporate debt do not appear to be levered to excess, mitigating risk of any credit ripple effects’. The data bears this out.
Companies are holding US$9.1 trillion of debt now, in contrast to the US$4.9 trillion in 2007 before the last financial crisis.
The financial system, and those who take money from banks, are more highly levered than they were prior to the last financial crisis.
US dollar debt a problem?
In its inaugural Financial Stability Report, the Fed stressed lurking dangers in corporate debt.
Although the Fed also used the opportunity to pat itself on the back for how well capitalised banks were, just as Janet Yellen did, the trouble was still highlighted.
The Fed noted that corporate debt relative to GDP is at record highs, and that credit standards have gotten worse again.
The amount of junk bonds and leveraged loans or ‘risky debt’ rose by 5% in the third quarter of 2018 to over US$2 trillion in size.
The central bank pointed to a number of other risks facing the markets.
Those include the outcome of Brexit, Italy’s finances and a slowing European economy, which could lead to more dollar appreciation.
If the US dollar were to continue to rise in value, it would make it harder for foreign companies that took out US dollar-denominated debt to repay it.
The Fed used the report to warn that trade wars, geopolitical tensions and slowdowns in China and other emerging market economies could negatively impact the US economy and markets.
All of these factors could not only impact the markets, as we’ve seen over the past several months, but also begin to creep in on how companies are able to repay their debts.
The problems aren’t going away, and neither is stock market volatility.
For The Daily Reckoning Australia Weekend